1965
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5459.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Hypertension and Mitral Valve Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gray (1954) and Roseman and Wasserman (1951) found that the incidence of hypertension was not significantly greater in patients with mitral stenosis than in control groups. These findings were not in accord with those of Obeyesekere et al (1965) who found that more than half their patients with mitral valve disease had a systemic blood pressure above normal.…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Gray (1954) and Roseman and Wasserman (1951) found that the incidence of hypertension was not significantly greater in patients with mitral stenosis than in control groups. These findings were not in accord with those of Obeyesekere et al (1965) who found that more than half their patients with mitral valve disease had a systemic blood pressure above normal.…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, arterial hypertension was found to be significantly correlated with MS and TR. A literature review revealed a higher incidence of systemic hypertension in patients with MS [ 25 ] but provided no explanation for it; the etiology could be the subject of a future prospective study aimed at investigating a possible causal relationship. Indeed, blood pressure elevation recently has been investigated as a risk factor for development of AS or AR [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further 12 derived considerable benefit from operation initially for a variable period of three to five years, but have since deteriorated and are now in a state of congestive cardiac failure with frank mitral incompetence. Three of these have systemic hypertension with renal damage, due in all probability to recurrent renal emboli (Obeyesekere et al, 1965). Fifty-eight, however, have maintained their improvement since operation, the period of follow-up being six months to nine years.…”
Section: Operative Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Systemic hypertension was recorded in 14 pre-operatively, and evidence of renal damage (albuminuria with raised blood urea and creatinine) was noted in five of those. Repeated emboli lodging in the kidney are now known to be a potent cause of subsequent renal damage and hypertension in mitral-valve disease (Obeyesekere et al, 1965), and it is reasonable to assume that such was the case in these five. A further two patients, who pre-operatively had normal blood pressure and renal function, have since developed this syndrome, several years after valvotomy.…”
Section: Associated Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%