2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.02014.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic growth of Leptosphaeria maculans from cotyledons to hypocotyls in oilseed rape: influence of number of infection sites, competitive growth and host polygenic resistance

Abstract: The influence of competitive effects between two isolates, of the number of infection sites on cotyledons and of host polygenic resistance on the systemic growth of Leptosphaeria maculans , the cause of phoma stem canker in oilseed rape ( Brassica napus ), were investigated. Controlled-condition experiments were conducted with two oilseed rape doubled haploid lines, one susceptible and the other with a high level of polygenic resistance, inoculated via wounded cotyledons with conidial suspensions obtained from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with results of previous work [6]. The development of more severe necrosis in hypocotyls of A30 than in those of C119 [28] suggests that quantitative resistance against L. maculans may also impede the growth of the pathogen from the cotyledon to the hypocotyl. There is a need to test a wide range of cultivars and DH lines under different conditions to investigate the relationship between quantitative resistance against L. maculans in leaf petiole and stem tissues identified in controlled environment experiments and quantitative ‘field’ resistance identified by end of cropping season disease assessments in field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with results of previous work [6]. The development of more severe necrosis in hypocotyls of A30 than in those of C119 [28] suggests that quantitative resistance against L. maculans may also impede the growth of the pathogen from the cotyledon to the hypocotyl. There is a need to test a wide range of cultivars and DH lines under different conditions to investigate the relationship between quantitative resistance against L. maculans in leaf petiole and stem tissues identified in controlled environment experiments and quantitative ‘field’ resistance identified by end of cropping season disease assessments in field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although canker symptoms can be produced on hypocotyls after cotyledon inoculation [28], production of canker symptoms requires 4 weeks at 6°C followed by 6 weeks at 20°C and hypocotyl infection is not representative of what happens in field conditions in the UK. Furthermore, the structure of hypocotyl is different from that of stem [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative resistance reduces disease severity, measured by canker length (Delourme et al, 2006;Travadon et al, 2009) and mycelial systemic growth (Huang et al, 2009). Competition effects during systemic growth have been detected (Travadon et al, 2009), as the canker severity in coinfected plants differed from the severity achieved by the same isolates inoculated alone. So far, fitness of isolates has been compared among isolates grown on media or as disease symptom size on young plants (Huang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the situation in Canada and Australia (Barbetti, 1976;Hall et al, 1996), secondary cycles of infection by means of conidia produced on leaf spots have not been documented in Europe. Cankers develop due to the systemic growth of fungal hyphae from leaf spots to the leaf petiole through xylem vessels, and subsequently to the stem base (Hammond et al, 1985;Travadon et al, 2009). The fungus can survive as hyphae in crop stubble, forming two kinds of fruiting bodies: pycnidia and pseudothecia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation