Textbook of Contact Dermatitis 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Contact Dermatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(48 reference statements)
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the Ni-patch-induced oral mucosa lesions are probably related to bowel damage that occurs after ingestion of Ni-containing foods that in turn, causes the A Ni patch may also cause development of general reactions such as itching and dermographia, suggesting that the omPT can effectively identify Ni-sensitive patients. Furthermore, besides reinforcing the observations that Ni intake causes contact stomatitis [2,3] and may trigger a preexistent ACD [4][5][6], our results show that the omPT is more sensitive than the epicutaneous version in recognizing the adverse effects of ingesting Ni- containing foods in a population of symptomatic patients. In this regard, the significant portion of Ni-sensitive patients identified by the omPT, as well as the substantial clinical differences between positive and negative omPT patients further support this simple test as an effective diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the Ni-patch-induced oral mucosa lesions are probably related to bowel damage that occurs after ingestion of Ni-containing foods that in turn, causes the A Ni patch may also cause development of general reactions such as itching and dermographia, suggesting that the omPT can effectively identify Ni-sensitive patients. Furthermore, besides reinforcing the observations that Ni intake causes contact stomatitis [2,3] and may trigger a preexistent ACD [4][5][6], our results show that the omPT is more sensitive than the epicutaneous version in recognizing the adverse effects of ingesting Ni- containing foods in a population of symptomatic patients. In this regard, the significant portion of Ni-sensitive patients identified by the omPT, as well as the substantial clinical differences between positive and negative omPT patients further support this simple test as an effective diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Similarly, Ni exposure through the intestinal mucosa following the ingestion of Ni-containing foods can result in other clinical conditions, including contact stomatitis [2,3]. Several studies have also reported that even small amounts of Ni ingested with a normal diet are enough to flare up a preexistent ACD [4][5][6]. However, these observations are occasional and fragmentary, so the sensitivity to dietary Ni is a condition still poorly understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1). The results of this study have been repeated and confirmed by several authors [6,12]. The evidence for immunological specificity includes flareup reactions at previous nickel contact sites, for example under metal spectacle frames (Fig.…”
Section: Medicamentssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The literature on systemic contact dermatitis is now comprehensive. Reviews include Cronin [4], Fisher [5], Menné et al [6] and Veien et al [7]. í Systemic contact dermatitis may occur after the systemic administration of a hapten in persons with contact sensitivity to the hapten.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition of food allergy [8] (see [9] for a discussion and references to further guidelines for classification) leads to the inclusion of diseases, such as celiac disease or rare conditions including food-induced nickel allergy (systemic contact dermatitis) [10] , besides IgE-mediated food allergy. While the symptomatology may be suggestive of the disease mechanism, the ultimate diagnosis lies in the demonstration of a pathophysiological immune response that may explain the symptoms.…”
Section: Is It Food Allergy?mentioning
confidence: 99%