2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): A bidirectional approach for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the therapeutic aerosol administered under pressure reported a more homogeneous distribution compared to liquid chemotherapy [6,7], a deeper tissue penetration [8,9] and a higher drug tissue concentration [10]. Promising results have been published in peritoneal metastasis of gastric [11][12][13], ovarian [14,15], colorectal [16], pancreatic [17,18] and hepatobiliary [19] origins, demonstrating that PIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated, with a good clinical response rate [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the therapeutic aerosol administered under pressure reported a more homogeneous distribution compared to liquid chemotherapy [6,7], a deeper tissue penetration [8,9] and a higher drug tissue concentration [10]. Promising results have been published in peritoneal metastasis of gastric [11][12][13], ovarian [14,15], colorectal [16], pancreatic [17,18] and hepatobiliary [19] origins, demonstrating that PIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated, with a good clinical response rate [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter reported on an overall histopathological regression rate (intention to treat) of 12-71% (35,52,56,(63)(64)(65). Four other studies reported on gastric cancer patients, and histopathological regression (intention to treat) varied from 25-50% (39,60,66,74). In ovarian cancer patients, histopathological regression (intention to treat) varied from 6-17% (38,53,58).…”
Section: Tumour Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, both primary and secondary non-access should be prevented as much as possible to prevent unnecessary interruptions of treatment. Both primary (34,35,38,39,42,(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(56)(57)(58)(59)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66) and secondary (34,35,(39)(40)(41)(42)47,(49)(50)(51)(54)(55)(56)(57)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)66) nonaccess rates widely varied among studies. Primary nonaccess was observed in 0-17% of patients, although two studies reported a primary non-access rate of 24% and 28%.…”
Section: Feasibility and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations