2019
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Cellular Activation Mapping of an Extinction-Impaired Animal Model

Abstract: Fear extinction diminishes conditioned fear responses and impaired fear extinction has been reported to be related to anxiety disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We and others have reported that 129S1/SvImJ (129S1) strain of mice showed selective impairments in fear extinction following successful auditory or contextual fear conditioning. To investigate brain regions involved in the impaired fear extinction of 129S1 mice, we systemically analyzed c-Fos expression patterns before and after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remote recall of contextual fear downregulates c-Fos in the hippocampus of WT (Gräff et al 2014; Wheeler et al 2013), but not in αCaMKII +/- mice (Frankland et al 2004). Contrary to our observation, recent extinction of contextual fear enhances c-Fos expression in the hippocampus of WT as compared to the Naive group of mice (Park and Chung 2019). This is possibly due to the difference in the basal levels of c-Fos in Naive groups or, again fear conditioning protocol (3 vs. 5 US).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remote recall of contextual fear downregulates c-Fos in the hippocampus of WT (Gräff et al 2014; Wheeler et al 2013), but not in αCaMKII +/- mice (Frankland et al 2004). Contrary to our observation, recent extinction of contextual fear enhances c-Fos expression in the hippocampus of WT as compared to the Naive group of mice (Park and Chung 2019). This is possibly due to the difference in the basal levels of c-Fos in Naive groups or, again fear conditioning protocol (3 vs. 5 US).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown for the first time that the T286A +/- mice exhibit impaired extinction of remote contextual fear memory, with spared extinction of recent contextual fear. Our results demonstrate that remote fear memory extinction failure was associated with upregulated c-Fos levels in the ENT, RE, CM, MD, AD, and MS. c-Fos immunomapping have been previously used to analyze neuronal substrates of many aspects of contextual fear memory processing, including fear memory encoding (Park and Chung 2019; Lin et al 2018; Frankland et al 2004), recall (Wheeler et al 2013; Hall et al 2001; Conejo et al 2007), recent extinction (Park and Chung 2019; Knox et al 2016), remote extinction (Silva et al 2018) and even extinction deficits (Park and Chung 2019; Hefner et al 2008; Talukdar et al 2018). Nevertheless, none of these studies investigated the role of autophosphorylation of IZCaMKII in remote fear memory extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in c-Fos have been reported as early as 1–3 h after blast exposure in the hippocampus and amygdala ( Säljö et al, 2002 ; Du et al, 2013 ; Rex et al, 2013 ; Ou et al, 2022 ), and elevated levels can persist ( Säljö et al, 2002 ; Russell et al, 2018b ). As described earlier, the PVT and central amygdala are involved in fear conditioning, and increased c-Fos activation in these regions was reported in a single prolonged stress mouse model of PTSD ( Penzo et al, 2015 ; Park and Chung, 2019 ; Azevedo et al, 2020 ). Only one study has examined IEG response 7 days after a restraint stressor and bTBI, and found sex differences in c-Fos response in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus ( Russell et al, 2018b ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It is important to note that we cannot preclude the possibility that CNO-mediated hM3Dq DREADD stimulation may evoke a differential degree of activation across specific forebrain circuits (Alexander et al, 2009), which should be taken into account in the interpretation of our behavioural results. Nevertheless, such broad activation of multiple forebrain regions is common in diverse ethological contexts (Duncan et al, 1996; Ons et al, 2004; Park and Chung, 2019), as well as in response to therapeutic modalities (Linden et al, 2004; Wise et al, 2007; Bechtholt et al, 2008) used to target mood-related disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%