Systematyzacja wzorów fleksyjnych dla „Słownika gramatycznego języka polskiego”

Saloni, Zygmunt

doi:10.17651/polon.36.1

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other full or clitic pairs, such as the third-person singular for feminine, neuter, and plural, do not differ at first glance. However, distributional, semantic, and syntactic evidence demonstrates amply that full pronouns and clitics are distinct for all Polish person/number/gender combinations (see Grzegorczykowa, Laskowski, & Wróbel, 1998, p. 339; Saloni & Świdziński, 1985; Witkoś, 1998, p. 150).…”

Section: Do Types In Polish and Ukrainianmentioning

confidence: 99%

Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian

Mykhaylyk¹,

Sopata

2015

Applied Psycholinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polish and Ukrainian pattern together syntactically in allowing various omissions in the same discourse settings, for example, when the referring element has been mentioned in a previous context. However, Ukrainian employs full object pronouns morphologically, whereas Polish uses clitics in the same environments. We exploit this contrast to compare the acquisition of clitics versus full pronouns, enriching previous accounts of omissions in child speech. The results of an elicited production experiment reveal that, in the two languages considered, 3- to 6-year-old children make no errors in direct object realization, but prefer to use null arguments up to the age of 5. It is crucial that there is no obvious difference between the acquisition patterns for clitics versus pronouns, which suggests that the morphophonological properties of direct objects are not primary predictors of object realization in languages that allow discourse-related omissions.

show abstract

Section: Do Types In Polish and Ukrainianmentioning

confidence: 99%

Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian

Mykhaylyk¹,

Sopata

2015

Applied Psycholinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because the authors of the dictionary did not include participles other than those classified as adjectival participles and used as person-descriptive adjectives (e.g., zrównoważony [even-tempered], otwarty [frank]), we did not distinguish participles as a category distinct from adjectives (cf. Saloni, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms

Gorbaniuk¹,

Korczak²,

Toruj³

et al. 2019

Current Issues in Personality Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lexical research based on the assumption that all the main human characteristics are encoded in the natural language constitutes one of the alternative ways of developing a taxonomy of individual differences in psychology. The majority of studies to date, including Polish ones, have been restricted to the analysis of the adjective lexicon, which means their results are at risk of reductionism. The aim of the presented research was to develop a classification of the complete Polish lexicon of person-descriptive terms (adjectives, participles, adverbs, nouns, and verbs). participants and procedure We analyzed 100,000 entries found in a universal dictionary of Polish and identified 27,813 terms used to describe human characteristics. The identified person-descriptive terms were classified by a team of 13 trained judges into 16 subcategories. The judges' taxonomic decisions were tested for validity and reliability. results Personality (dispositional) descriptors (5,598) constitute 20.1% of the Polish lexicon of person-descriptors; this includes 1,641 adjectives and participles, 612 adverbs, 1,442 attribute-nouns, 1,029 type-nouns, and 916 verbs. The analysis of the semantic redundancy of terms representing different parts of speech but having the same common morpheme among dispositional descriptors revealed 1,979 morphemes with distinct meanings. Only 64% of these morphemes are represented by adjectives. conclusions Adjectives constitute the largest group of personality (dispositional) descriptors but do not account for the entire Polish personality lexicon. The results of the study are a point of departure for research into the specificity of the structure of personality descriptions in the Polish language using various linguistic categories and for a comprehensive study on the entire Polish personality lexicon.

show abstract

“…Trzecie wydanie przyjęło postać aplikacji internetowej http://sgjp.pl (Saloni et al 2015;Woliński i Kieraś 2016). Na potrzeby tego wydania wzory fleksyjne poddano rewizji i opracowano ich nową klasyfikację (Saloni 2016). W trzecim wydaniu SGJP osiągnął wielkość ponad 330 000 leksemów 6 odpowiadających prawie 4 300 000 wykładników tekstowych.…”

Section: Sgjpunclassified

Automatyczna analiza składnikowa języka polskiego

Woliński¹

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematyzacja wzorów fleksyjnych dla „Słownika gramatycznego języka polskiego”

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian

Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian

Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms

Automatyczna analiza składnikowa języka polskiego

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About