2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12398-020-00281-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematik im Power-to-X-Ansatz – Identifikation, Charakterisierung und Clusterung der Power-to-X-Technologien

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drop-in AAFs are mostly produced by X-to-liquid pathways [25][26][27], where the X stands for the underlying energy source. Potential energy sources can be gas, coal, biomass, and hydrogen.…”
Section: Aviation Fuels and Previous Sustainability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drop-in AAFs are mostly produced by X-to-liquid pathways [25][26][27], where the X stands for the underlying energy source. Potential energy sources can be gas, coal, biomass, and hydrogen.…”
Section: Aviation Fuels and Previous Sustainability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "X" can in turn be subdivided into the superordinate product groups Power-to-Liquid (methanol, eFuels, e.g., synthetic kerosene, ammonia) and Power-to-Gas, e.g., synthetic natural gas. According to the definition, these conversion processes are categorized as indirect electricity use, as the electrical power must first be converted into hydrogen which is subsequently used in the synthesis processes [3]. The products have been part of everyday life for decades and are used as base chemicals in industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%