2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2021.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of the rare Amazonian genus Eutrachelophis (Serpentes: Dipsadidae), with an emended diagnosis for Eutrachelophis papilio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small sample size of molecular data available for Apostolepis precludes us from making general statements on the systematic relationships of the group. Although Apostolepis is recovered as monophyletic by this study and other recent phylogenies (e.g., Zaher et al 2019;Moraes et al 2021), only seven terminals have limited gene fragments available (up to four) for comparison, out of the 34 valid species, and key taxa remain unavailable for comparison. For instance, the monotypic genera Coronelaps Hofstadler-Deiques, 2010 andParapostolepis Amaral, 1930 have not yet been tested under a molecular systematic framework, and their relationships with their close counterparts (Elapomorphus and Apostolepis, respectively) remain hypothesized largely upon morphological characters interpreted as putatively autapomorphic (Lema & Hofstadler-Deiques 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The small sample size of molecular data available for Apostolepis precludes us from making general statements on the systematic relationships of the group. Although Apostolepis is recovered as monophyletic by this study and other recent phylogenies (e.g., Zaher et al 2019;Moraes et al 2021), only seven terminals have limited gene fragments available (up to four) for comparison, out of the 34 valid species, and key taxa remain unavailable for comparison. For instance, the monotypic genera Coronelaps Hofstadler-Deiques, 2010 andParapostolepis Amaral, 1930 have not yet been tested under a molecular systematic framework, and their relationships with their close counterparts (Elapomorphus and Apostolepis, respectively) remain hypothesized largely upon morphological characters interpreted as putatively autapomorphic (Lema & Hofstadler-Deiques 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%