2014
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.179.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of the Octopleura Clade of Miconia (Melastomataceae: Miconieae) in Tropical America

Abstract: The Octopleura clade of Miconia is a natural group of Neotropical subshrubs and small trees comprising some thirty-three species. These had previously been described in Ossaea and Clidemia, two traditionally recognized genera of Miconieae, but this natural group is nested within the megadiverse genus Miconia. This study represents the first comprehensive monograph of the clade across its entire range based on a study of over 2100 collections from seven herbaria. Thirteen new combinations are made (Miconia agui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Este conjunto de caracteres también se presenta en el género Tococa Aublet, que se diferencia de Miconia principalmente por la presencia de mirmecodomacios en ambas hojas y los pétalos emarginados apicalmente (Michelangeli, 2005). Sin embargo, y con base en filogenias moleculares, se reconoce que Miconia es un grupo parafilético, al igual que la mayoría de los géneros más diversos de la tribu (Michelangeli, et al, 2004Goldenberg, et al, 2008), razón por la cual se ha propuesto incluir a Tococa, así como a la mayoría de los géneros de Miconiaeae, dentro de Miconia (ver Michelangeli y Meier, 2013; Gamba y Almeda, 2014;Michelangeli, et al, 2016Michelangeli, et al, , 2018. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.848 Rev.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Este conjunto de caracteres también se presenta en el género Tococa Aublet, que se diferencia de Miconia principalmente por la presencia de mirmecodomacios en ambas hojas y los pétalos emarginados apicalmente (Michelangeli, 2005). Sin embargo, y con base en filogenias moleculares, se reconoce que Miconia es un grupo parafilético, al igual que la mayoría de los géneros más diversos de la tribu (Michelangeli, et al, 2004Goldenberg, et al, 2008), razón por la cual se ha propuesto incluir a Tococa, así como a la mayoría de los géneros de Miconiaeae, dentro de Miconia (ver Michelangeli y Meier, 2013; Gamba y Almeda, 2014;Michelangeli, et al, 2016Michelangeli, et al, , 2018. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.848 Rev.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Early studies have consolidated the sister relationship of Olisbeoideae and the remaining Melastomataceae, settling on the currently accepted family circumscription (Conti, Litt & Systma, 1996;APG, 1998; but see Clausing & Renner, 2001 for a different perspective). Latter studies focused in some tribal re-arrangements (Fritsch et al, 2004;Penneys et al, 2010, Michelangeli et al, 2011, generic placement (Amorim, Goldenberg & Michelangeli, 2009;Goldenberg et al, 2012;Michelangeli, Ulloa & Sosa, 2014;Goldenberg et al, 2015;Kriebel, 2016;Rocha et al, 2016;Zeng et al, 2016), phylogenetic evaluation of higher species-rich lineages (Michelangeli et al, 2004, Stone, 2006Goldenberg et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2008;Michelangeli et al, 2013), and lower taxon phylogenies (Bécquer-Granados et al, 2008;Reginato, Michelangeli & Goldenberg, 2010;Penneys, 2013;Kriebel, Michelangeli & Kelly, 2015;Gamba-Moreno & Almeda, 2014;Majure et al, 2015;Reginato & Michelangeli, 2016). Even in family-wide phylogenies, the level of variation across these few sampled plastid markers is unsatisfactory, as evidenced by low statistical support among many relationships in different published analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies have consolidated the sister relationship of Olisbeoideae and the remaining Melastomataceae, settling on the currently accepted family circumscription (Conti, Litt & Systma, 1996;APG, 1998; but see Clausing & Renner, 2001 for a different perspective). Latter studies focused in some tribal re-arrangements (Fritsch et al, 2004;Penneys et al, 2010, Michelangeli et al, 2011, generic placement (Amorim, Goldenberg & Michelangeli, 2009;Goldenberg et al, 2012;Michelangeli, Ulloa & Sosa, 2014;Goldenberg et al, 2015;Kriebel, 2016;Rocha et al, 2016;Zeng et al, 2016), phylogenetic evaluation of higher species-rich lineages (Michelangeli et al, 2004, Stone, 2006Goldenberg et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2008;Michelangeli et al, 2013), and lower taxon phylogenies (Bécquer-Granados et al, 2008;Reginato, Michelangeli & Goldenberg, 2010;Penneys, 2013;Kriebel, Michelangeli & Kelly, 2015;Gamba-Moreno & Almeda, 2014;Majure et al, 2015;Reginato & Michelangeli, 2016). Even in family-wide phylogenies, the level of variation across these few sampled plastid markers is unsatisfactory, as evidenced by low statistical support among many relationships in different published analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%