2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.69.064307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics in the structure of low-lying, nonyrast bandhead configurations of strongly deformed nuclei

Abstract: An empirical investigation of the trends in the properties of the nonyrast K =2 ␥ + and K =0 2 + bandhead configurations in nuclei that are related to one another through the addition or removal of ␣-particle-like structures, reveals their complex and changing behavior in contrast to the smooth behavior of the yrast states. A systematic application of the pseudo-SU(3) model for such a sequence of deformed nuclei from the rare earth region leads to an accurate and unified description of not only yrast, but nony… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For nuclei from Table 3, in the middle of the shell, the ground and the γ band belong to the same (λ, µ) with λ > µ. At the limits of the deformed region the ground band states have oblate deformation (λ < µ) and the K π = 0 + 2 and the K π = 2 + 1 bands are mixed in the same SU(3) irrep [18]. The analysis for nuclei from Table 4 is under investigation.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For nuclei from Table 3, in the middle of the shell, the ground and the γ band belong to the same (λ, µ) with λ > µ. At the limits of the deformed region the ground band states have oblate deformation (λ < µ) and the K π = 0 + 2 and the K π = 2 + 1 bands are mixed in the same SU(3) irrep [18]. The analysis for nuclei from Table 4 is under investigation.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The resulted fitted parameters of the rotor part of the Hamiltonian are given in the fourth to seventh columns. [18,20]. The main reason for obtaining the position of each collective band with respect to each other, as well as of each level within the band is the specific content of the obtained SU(3) irreps into the collective states, which is related to their deformations.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hamiltonian with the considered dynamical symmetry (25) is expressed in terms of the first and second order Casimir operators of the different subgroups in its corresponding chain (16):…”
Section: Reduction Through the Non-compact Sp(2r) 221 Algebraic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of possible choices for the correspondence of the excited bands to sequences of states in the symplectic space and the mixing of the rotational and vibrational degrees of freedom like in the U (6)-limit allows us to reproduce correctly the behavior of the excited bands with respect to one another, which can change a lot even in neighboring nuclei [25].…”
Section: Application To Real Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the states of first excited β−band and/or γ-band may belong to two different diagonals (λ, µ = 0), K = 0 and/or to (λ, µ = 2), K = 0 and/or 2, so that ν = L or/and ν = L − 2 for L-even and ν = L − 1 for Lodd respectively and ∆ν = 2 for each neighboring su(3) multiplets in a band under consideration. This variety of possible choices for the excited bands allows us to reproduce correctly the behavior of these bands with respect to one another, which can change a lot even in neighboring nuclei because of the mixing of the vibrational and rotational collective modes [28].…”
Section: Application To Real Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%