2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematically assessed symptoms as outcome predictors in emergency patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the incidence of AP was comparable to that found in European [4] and US studies [36,37]. However, in our prospective all-comer cohort, AP was only the seventh most prevalent symptom, while it was the second most prevalent in the CHARITEM study and often among the top five symptoms in European studies [5]. As we systematically interviewed all patients about the presence of abdominal pain, underreporting is highly unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison, the incidence of AP was comparable to that found in European [4] and US studies [36,37]. However, in our prospective all-comer cohort, AP was only the seventh most prevalent symptom, while it was the second most prevalent in the CHARITEM study and often among the top five symptoms in European studies [5]. As we systematically interviewed all patients about the presence of abdominal pain, underreporting is highly unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While survival was excellent in patients under 65 years of age, it was lower in patients 65 and older. Abdominal pain as a group does not seem to be a high-risk symptom, unlike dyspnea, altered mentation, and nonspecific complaints, such as generalized weakness [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study provided evidence for both hypotheses: On one hand, two thirds of these patients were admitted to the hospital, and half of these patients were hospitalized 5 days or longer. On the other hand, in‐hospital mortality was 2%, and direct transfer to intensive care occurred in just 4% of these patients, which is comparable to an average ED population . Our data show differences in hospital and ED LOS between the centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients' ED diagnoses is a well-accepted predictor of short term mortality. The patients primary ED diagnoses and the patients ED chief complaint as well as the combination of chief complaint have been closely associated to patient outcome such as hospitalization and mortality [50][51][52][53]. The accuracy of comorbidity scores can be questioned and data suggest that comorbidity scores only provide a modest improvement on age adjustment [54].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%