Systematic Wood Anatomy of Desmopsis, Sapranthus and Stenanona (Annonaceae)

Welle, Ben; Rooden, Jan van

doi:10.1163/22941932-90000741

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2012). In this way, we show cases of closely related genera that can be distinguished on the basis of wood anatomy, such as the Sapranthus alliance (Ter Welle & Van Rooden, 1982) and the Malmea alliance (Ter Welle, 1998). Greenwayodendron oliveri (Engl.)…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, we have arranged the photographs according to the clades that are recognized as subfamilies and tribes in Chatrou et al (2012). In this way, we show cases of closely related genera that can be distinguished on the basis of wood anatomy, such as the Sapranthus alliance (Ter Welle & Van Rooden, 1982) and the Malmea alliance (Ter Welle, 1998). Greenwayodendron oliveri (Engl.)…”

Section: Comparing Wood Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5C–E), Ter Welle & Van Rooden (1982) concluded that the three genera could be separated on the basis of the presence vs. absence of uniseriate rays, and quantitative ray characters such as height, width and number and vessel member length. However, they were unable to distinguish this group of three genera from Annonaceae as a whole as the characters ‘… match perfectly the annonaceous wood anatomical character complex’ (Ter Welle & Van Rooden, 1982, p. 19).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae

Koek‐Noorman

Westra

2012

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, a general description of the microscopic wood anatomy of Annonaceae is given. We provide a description of the wood anatomical features of the family and of all subfamilies and tribes, all from material in the Utrecht Wood collection. Hand‐lens images can be an important help in identification, not only at the family level, but also at the level of genera or below, notwithstanding the fact that the number of characters that can be easily observed in end‐grain photographs is restricted. The differences are often slight and difficult to summarize in a few words, making illustrations an indispensable tool. Therefore, we provide end‐grain photographs of cross‐sections of wood of 66 genera and > 90 species of Annonaceae. The variation seen in lens key characters is discussed against the framework of the current phylogenetic tree of the family. Additional remarks on microscopic features are given when appropriate. © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 135–189.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparing Wood Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae

Koek‐Noorman

Westra

2012

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…brasiliensis, Kaastra (1973) (Ter Welle, 1985). Because of these differences the species will be presented individually here.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Systematic Wood Anatomy Of The Moraceae (Urticales) IV. Genera of the Tribe Moreae With Urticaceous Stamens

Welle¹,

Koek‐Noorman²,

Topper³

1986

IAWA J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The wood anatomy of the genera of the tribe Moreae with urticaceous stamens, viz. Broussonetia, Maclura s.l. (inc1uding Cardiogyne, Chlorophora, and Cudrania), Malaisia, Milicia, Morus, Olmedia, Pachytrophe, Plecospermum, Sloetiopsis, Streblus s.1. (inc1uding Paratrophis, Phyllochlamys, Pseudostreblus, and Sloetia), and Trophis s.1. (inc1uding Calpidochlamys and Maillardia), is described in detail. Separate descriptions have been made for sections and/or subgenera to facilitate the discussion about the generic delimitations made by several taxonomists. The following generic combinations previously proposed by taxonomists are supported by wood anatomical features: Broussonetia + Allaeanthus; Maclura + Chlorophora + Cardiogyne + Cudrania + Plecospermum. The segregation of the African species of Chlorophora in a separate genus Milicia is supported by wood anatomical evidence. The broad genus concept of Streblus and Trophis is not supported by wood anatomy. Several seetions of these genera should be reinstated as genera. The correlations between wood anatomy, latitude, habit and habitat are discussed as far as allowed by the material studied. Characters useful for the delimitation of the genera proved to be the size of the intervascular pits, the parenchyma distribution, and the lengths of fibres and vessel elements. Rhombic crystals, vitreous silica and radial latex tubes usually are useful additional characters.

show abstract

“…tree of up to 13 m high, found in the lowland forests and along seashores. The wood anatomy of these two species differs in many features (Ter Welle, 1985). Because of these differences the species will be presented individually here.…”

Section: Maclura Sectmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Systematic Wood Anatomy of the Moraceae (Urticales) V. Genera of the Tribe Moreae Without Urticaceous Stamens

Welle¹,

Koek‐Noorman²,

Topper³

1986

IAWA J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The wood anatomy of the Moreae without urticaceous stamens is described in detail. Generic descriptions of the following genera are provided: Antiaropsis, Artocarpus, Bagassa, Batocarpus, Clarisia, Parartocarpus, Poulsenia, Prainea, Sorocea, Sparattosyce, and Treculia. Wood anatomical variation below the genus level is very limited, except in the genus Clarisia. Intergeneric variation, however, is much more evident. Most genera can be recognised by the presence or absence of septate fibres, and of radial latex tubes, the size of the intervascular pits, the parenchyma distribution, and crystal distribution. The diagnostic and taxonomic value of several characters is discussed.

show abstract

Systematic Wood Anatomy of Desmopsis, Sapranthus and Stenanona (Annonaceae)

Cited by 5 publications

References 13 publications

Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae

Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae

The Systematic Wood Anatomy Of The Moraceae (Urticales) IV. Genera of the Tribe Moreae With Urticaceous Stamens

The Systematic Wood Anatomy of the Moraceae (Urticales) V. Genera of the Tribe Moreae Without Urticaceous Stamens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About