2002
DOI: 10.1615/multscientechn.v14.i3.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Testing of the Two-Phase Pressure-Drop Equations for Horizontal Dividing T-Junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the previous works on the two-phase flow at dividing T-junctions were for larger than 25 mm in hydraulic diameter. (Reimann et al (1988), Azzopardi (1999), Levac et al (2002)) In the review article of Azzopardi (1999), possibility (of utilizing T-junction as a part of phase separation equipment) and problems (of mal-distributions in condensers or gas distribution systems), governing parameters, phenomena, prediction models and pressure drop are stated extensively and not going to be repeated here. On the other hand, the hydraulic diameter of the headers of compact heat exchangers ranges mostly below about 10 mm, and currently there are only a limited number of studies available for this size range, represented by Hong (1978), Stacey et al (2000) and Lee andLee (2001, 2004a), Das et al (2005), Wren et al (2005) and Tae and Cho (2006) as listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow At Single T-junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous works on the two-phase flow at dividing T-junctions were for larger than 25 mm in hydraulic diameter. (Reimann et al (1988), Azzopardi (1999), Levac et al (2002)) In the review article of Azzopardi (1999), possibility (of utilizing T-junction as a part of phase separation equipment) and problems (of mal-distributions in condensers or gas distribution systems), governing parameters, phenomena, prediction models and pressure drop are stated extensively and not going to be repeated here. On the other hand, the hydraulic diameter of the headers of compact heat exchangers ranges mostly below about 10 mm, and currently there are only a limited number of studies available for this size range, represented by Hong (1978), Stacey et al (2000) and Lee andLee (2001, 2004a), Das et al (2005), Wren et al (2005) and Tae and Cho (2006) as listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow At Single T-junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%