2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12043-018-1645-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic study of rigid triaxiality in Ba–Pt nuclei and role of $$Z=64$$ Z = 64 subshell effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for 164 Hf the yrast band is arising due to ground band upto spin I = 8 + h. At I = 10 + h, (1,2p) is contributing to the yrast band and for I ≥ 12 + h yrast band is Fig. 2 The labels (0,0), (2,0), (4,0), (1,2n), (3,2n), (1,2p), (3,2p), (2,4) and (4,4) in the band diagrams of 164−174 Hf correspond to ground, γ -, 2γ -, 2n-aligned band, γ -band built on this 2n-aligned state, 2p-aligned band, γ -band built on this 2p-aligned state, (2n+2p) aligned band and γ -band built on this 4-quasiparticle band…”
Section: Analysis Of Band Diagrams For 164−174 Hf Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for 164 Hf the yrast band is arising due to ground band upto spin I = 8 + h. At I = 10 + h, (1,2p) is contributing to the yrast band and for I ≥ 12 + h yrast band is Fig. 2 The labels (0,0), (2,0), (4,0), (1,2n), (3,2n), (1,2p), (3,2p), (2,4) and (4,4) in the band diagrams of 164−174 Hf correspond to ground, γ -, 2γ -, 2n-aligned band, γ -band built on this 2n-aligned state, 2p-aligned band, γ -band built on this 2p-aligned state, (2n+2p) aligned band and γ -band built on this 4-quasiparticle band…”
Section: Analysis Of Band Diagrams For 164−174 Hf Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the question of whether nonaxially-symmetric nuclei are γ -soft or triaxial has been an ongoing and active issue in nuclear structure physics for over 50 years. However, despite considerable effort, the precise description of axially asymmetric shapes and the resulting triaxial quantum many-body rotors still remain an open problem [1][2][3][4][5]. Theoretically, triaxiality has been envisaged for a long time but explicit experimental evidences have only been found in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches exist for calculating the asymmetry parameter γ eff from experimental observables such as R 4/2 =E 4+ /E 2+ and B(E 2 ). Davydov and Filippov [6] used this ratio to determine γ eff , as well as Varshni and Bose estimated γ eff by using the ratio R 4/2 [5]. And the calculation of γ eff from B(E 2 ) values leads to ambiguous values of γ eff and more reliable values are expected from the level energies [5].…”
Section: Radial Schrodinger Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davydov and Filippov [6] used this ratio to determine γ eff , as well as Varshni and Bose estimated γ eff by using the ratio R 4/2 [5]. And the calculation of γ eff from B(E 2 ) values leads to ambiguous values of γ eff and more reliable values are expected from the level energies [5]. But an estimation of asymmetry parameters of quadrupole and octupole deformations η eff and γ eff was not carried out.…”
Section: Radial Schrodinger Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation