Day 2 Thu, May 15, 2014 2014
DOI: 10.2118/spe-169787-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Study of Barite Nucleation and Inhibition with Various Polymeric Scale Inhibitors by Novel Laser Apparatus

Abstract: This work reports a reliable and systematic study of barite nucleation kinetics in the presence of scale inhibitors from 4 °C to 90 °C and at various conditions. In this study, we designed and developed an apparatus to study the nucleation kinetics of barite scale formation by monitoring the change of photo-current created by 5 mW, 635 nm red laser. The photo-detector has a wide wavelength range where sensitivity has a peak at 960 nm. A set of convex and concave lens were used to control the bea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that because of the nonideal nature of ions in the mixed electrolyte system at given conditions, the concentrations of barium and sulfate ions needed to achieve the same supersaturation level at elevated pressure were considerably higher than those at lower pressure (see tables). As mentioned in the Experimental Details section, our HP dynamic flow apparatus does not allow us to monitor the nucleation time for longer than 2 h. To determine the nucleation time at ambient pressure (i.e., at 0.10 MPa), a laser light scattering detection method was used, and it was estimated to be 4.2 h. A comparison of the measured nucleation time indicates a significant effect of pressure on barite nucleation kinetics. For instance, barite nucleation time decreased from 4.2 h to 10 min when the pressure was increased to 103.42 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that because of the nonideal nature of ions in the mixed electrolyte system at given conditions, the concentrations of barium and sulfate ions needed to achieve the same supersaturation level at elevated pressure were considerably higher than those at lower pressure (see tables). As mentioned in the Experimental Details section, our HP dynamic flow apparatus does not allow us to monitor the nucleation time for longer than 2 h. To determine the nucleation time at ambient pressure (i.e., at 0.10 MPa), a laser light scattering detection method was used, and it was estimated to be 4.2 h. A comparison of the measured nucleation time indicates a significant effect of pressure on barite nucleation kinetics. For instance, barite nucleation time decreased from 4.2 h to 10 min when the pressure was increased to 103.42 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the Experimental Details section, our HP dynamic flow apparatus does not allow us to monitor the nucleation time for longer than 2 h. To determine the nucleation time at ambient pressure (i.e., at 0.10 MPa), a laser light scattering detection method 44 was used, and it was estimated to be 4.2 h. A comparison of the measured nucleation time indicates a significant effect of pressure on barite nucleation kinetics. For instance, barite nucleation time decreased from 4.2 h to 10 min when the pressure was increased to 103.42 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solution turbidity can be measured with a turbidity meter 31,36 or through transmitted red laser (wavelength is 635 nm) beam intensity changes. 50 The two methods have been examined and show identical results for barite induction time measurements. 50 In this study, a turbidity meter was used in measurements done by Kan, as noted in Table S1; a laser method was used in all other measurements.…”
Section: ■ Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The apparatus to measure barite induction time adopted in this study is based on a laser nucleation detection method developed previously. 26 In the previous study, this apparatus has been applied to test the inhibition efficiency of several scale inhibitors at different pHs, temperatures, and saturation indexes. Figure 1 illustrates the schematic of the experimental apparatus.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Measurement Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%