Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare

Abstract

Healthcare decisions for individual patients and for public health policies should be informed by the best available research evidence. The practice of evidence-based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient's values and expectations. Primary care physicians need evidence for both clinical practice and for public health decision making. The evidence comes from good reviews which is a state-of-the-art synthesis of current evidence on a given research question. Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play a vital role in decision making in evidence-based medical practice. Given that most clinicians and public health professionals do not have the time to track down all the original articles, critically read them, and obtain the evidence they need for their questions, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines may be their best source of evidence. Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers. The objective of this article is to introduce the primary care physicians about the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used, and thereby helping them with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review which will be helpful for their day-to-day clinical practice and research activities.

Effective patient safety education for novice RNs: A systematic review

“…Thus, a mathematic summary meta-analysis of the outcomes using the available statistical results would provide little insight for readers. [77] …”

Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews

“…To our knowledge, authorship trends have not been investigated for Cochrane reviews previously. The Cochrane Collaboration is an international organisation that aims to produce systematic reviews and meta‐analyses with state‐of‐the‐art methodology . The mission of Cochrane reviews is to promote worldwide evidence‐based health decision‐making research that is of high quality, relevant, and accessible…”

How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review

“…David Sackett defined meta-analysis as a “specific statistical strategy for assembling the results of several studies into a single estimate” [7-8]. …”