Background
Middle molecule removal and albumin loss have been studied in medium cut-off (MCO) membranes on hemodialysis (HD). It is unknown if hemodiafiltration (HDF) with MCO membranes provides additional benefit. We aimed to compare the removal of small solutes and β2-microglobulin (B2M), albumin, and total proteins between MCO and high flux (HFX) membranes with both HD and HDF, respectively.
Methods
The cross-over study comprised four weeks, one each with post-dilutional HDF using HFX (HFX-HDF), MCO (MCO-HDF), HD with HFX (HFX-HD), and MCO (MCO-HD). MCO and HFX differ with respect to several characteristics, including membrane composition, pore size distribution, and surface area (HFX, 2.5 m2; MCO, 1.7 m2). There were two study treatments per week, one after the long inter-dialytic interval, the other mid-week. Reduction ratios of vitamin B12, B2M, phosphate, uric acid, and urea corrected for hemoconcentration were computed. Dialysis albumin and total protein loss during the treatment were quantified from dialysate samples.
Results
Twelve anuric patients were studied (six females; 44±19 years; dialysis vintage 35.2±28 months). The blood flow was 369±23 ml/min, dialysate flow was 495±61 ml/min, the ultrafiltration volume was 2.8±0.74 liters. No significant differences were found regarding the removal of B2M, vitamin B12 and water-soluble solutes between dialytic modalities and dialyzers. Albumin and total protein loss were significantly higher in MCO than HFX groups when compared with the same modality. HDF groups had significantly higher albumin and total protein loss than HD groups when compared with the same dialyzer. MCO-HDF showed the highest protein loss among all groups.
Conclusions
MCO-HD is not superior to HFX-HD and HFX-HDF for both middle molecule and water-soluble solute removal. Protein loss was more pronounced with MCO when compared to HFX on both HD and HDF modalities. MCO-HDF has no additional benefits regarding better removal of B2M but resulted in greater protein loss than MCO-HD.