2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review Shows That Work Done by Storm Waves Can Be Misinterpreted as Tsunami-Related Because Commonly Used Hydrodynamic Equations Are Flawed

Abstract: Cox et al. Boulder Deposits and Storm Waves during storms and should therefore be re-evaluated. This is especially important for CBD that have been incorporated into long-term coastal risk assessments, which are compromised if the CBD are misinterpreted. CBD dynamics can be better determined from a combination of detailed field measurements, modeling, and experiments. A clearer understanding of emplacement mechanisms will result in more reliable hazard analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the average of the largest third of waves over a one hour period) reached as much as 17.6m (on 1 February 2014). These deep‐water values translate to 9–13m SWH at the coast (Janjić, ; Cox et al ., ). Maximum wave heights (for rare individual waves) may have been as much as twice the SWH; and nonlinear interactions with uneven topography near the steep coasts may have generated additional amplifications (Brennan et al ., ; Herterich and Dias, ).…”
Section: Winter 2013–2014: the North Atlantic ‘Storm Factory’ And Itsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the average of the largest third of waves over a one hour period) reached as much as 17.6m (on 1 February 2014). These deep‐water values translate to 9–13m SWH at the coast (Janjić, ; Cox et al ., ). Maximum wave heights (for rare individual waves) may have been as much as twice the SWH; and nonlinear interactions with uneven topography near the steep coasts may have generated additional amplifications (Brennan et al ., ; Herterich and Dias, ).…”
Section: Winter 2013–2014: the North Atlantic ‘Storm Factory’ And Itsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By using Equations (3)-(6), H m values even close to 6 m are obtained, while, by using Equations (7) and (8), H m does not exceed 4 m, except for Boulders e, h, and k. However, we remark that these hydrodynamic equations have limitations. Reference [50] pointed out that, apart from flaws in the formulas, the estimation of both C L and C D is critical; therefore, instead of applying values excerpted from the literature, the estimation should be accomplished with strict reference to the local physical conditions. As an example, higher values than the one (0.178) usually used for C L were obtained by both field and modeling investigations [51,52].…”
Section: Boulder Displacements and Wave Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test site exhibits well-developed boulder ridges that sit 8-15 m above high water,~30-70 m inland ( Figure 1), and contain boulders with characteristic masses of tonnes to several tonnes, with intermediate axes of order 1 m [99] (sites S31-S33 in Table A2 of Ronadh . Individual blocks in the ridges (often concentrated at the seaward edge: Figure 3) tend to be larger, and commonly weigh tens of tonnes, up to ≈100 t in some cases (intermediate axes of order 2-5 m, density 2.66 t m −3 [65,76].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%