Systematic review on stakeholder collaboration for a circular built environment: Current research trends, gaps and future directions

Client and Therapists’ Subjective Understanding of an Ideal Therapy Room: A Divergent Reflection of Experience

“…However, the collaboration of the therapist colleagues is implicated here if the desired ideal therapy room would be achieved through flexibility. This thus supports the need to involve all stakeholders in the configuration of an ideal therapy room (Pineo et al, 2020;Senaratne et al, 2023) and has implications for psychotherapeutic services to foster such collaboration. The need to balance how the therapy room projects the therapist's personality to meet the client's therapeutic needs is also implicated.…”

“…Research findings from other disciplines, such as nursing and psychiatry, have acknowledged how individual preferences, different levels of sensitivity and distractibility, as well as the levels of intimacy associated with topics of discussion, could impact the ideal healing environment from patients' perspectives (Gregory et al, 2022;La Torre, 2006;Sakallaris et al, 2015). However, the significance of stakeholders' collaboration in constructing and configuring a built environment has also been acknowledged (Pineo et al, 2020;Pineo & Moore, 2022;Senaratne et al, 2023). Since the therapist and the client in a therapeutic environment are the primary stakeholders spending time together in the therapy room, the need to understand their perspectives about what constitutes an ideal therapy room becomes tenable.…”

Cultivating Sustainable Construction: Stakeholder Insights Driving Circular Economy Innovation for Inclusive Resource Equity

“…There was a unanimous call for heightened administration involvement, as identified previously, underscoring the pivotal role of governmental bodies in driving policy and regulatory frameworks conducive to circular practices. As reported by Senaratne et al [75], the adoption of circularity frameworks and models seems to be a trend in CE adoption projects, including digital technologies such as blockchain. Embracing digitalisation emerged as a key opportunity, suggesting that leveraging technology can streamline processes and enhance efficiency in the construction sector and its transition to circularity, as indicated in Çetin et al [76] and Senaratne et al [75].…”

“…As reported by Senaratne et al [75], the adoption of circularity frameworks and models seems to be a trend in CE adoption projects, including digital technologies such as blockchain. Embracing digitalisation emerged as a key opportunity, suggesting that leveraging technology can streamline processes and enhance efficiency in the construction sector and its transition to circularity, as indicated in Çetin et al [76] and Senaratne et al [75]. Participants expressed the need for more pilot cases that can serve as practical models for the successful implementation of circularity strategies, as well as the importance of global collaboration through knowledge transfer improvement, sharing the best practices and technical and economic performance on a broader scale [66].…”

“…Other crucial steps for a holistic and impactful transition towards a circular built environment are universalising reuse through standardised policies and legislations, creating incentives and disincentives, evaluating the cost of carbon emissions, implementing material passports for new constructions, leveraging BIM, the need for circularity indicators and monitoring to quantify the benefits, and ensuring industry funding availability due to the perceived lack of economic resources [78]. In addition, the recent study by Senaratne et al [75] highlighted the lack of CE promotion among stakeholder engagement strategies as a key urgent challenge to fostering effective collaboration. Zadeh et al [77] emphasised the need for potential synergies between science and practice to create and increase awareness among construction industry stakeholders.…”