2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
4
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While surgical revision has traditionally been used to treat weight regain, the procedure is associated with limited efficacy data and higher complication rates than that of the index surgery. [27][28][29][30] Alternatively, endoscopic techniques have recently been developed to treat weight regain. These include sclerotherapy where sodium morrhuate is injected around the GJA to reduce the GJA size, 31 32 argon plasma coagulation, 33 34 endoscopic plication and endoscopic suturing to close a small gastrogastric fistula and/or to reduce the size of the GJA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While surgical revision has traditionally been used to treat weight regain, the procedure is associated with limited efficacy data and higher complication rates than that of the index surgery. [27][28][29][30] Alternatively, endoscopic techniques have recently been developed to treat weight regain. These include sclerotherapy where sodium morrhuate is injected around the GJA to reduce the GJA size, 31 32 argon plasma coagulation, 33 34 endoscopic plication and endoscopic suturing to close a small gastrogastric fistula and/or to reduce the size of the GJA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only justification that one should hence need for RBS is whether the risks of RBS are outweighed by the benefits. This question has not yet been and perhaps cannot be answered with level 1 evidence given the sheer number of studies now reporting on the safety and efficacy of RBS [10,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent systematic review of the ASMBS Revision Task Force, suggest the conversion to LRYGB in case of severe GERD post-LSG refractory to PPI treatment as effective option [6] (Reviewer 2 comment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When GERD symptoms significantly impair patients' quality of life, regardless of whether the symptoms are combined with insufficient weight loss or weight regain, revision surgery is indicated. Although conversion to LRYGB seems to be the preferred revision approach, resection of the residual fundus or neofundus (fundectomy as the main part of a resleeve) with hiatal defect repair (if present) might be an alternative strategy in some patients [1,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%