2023
DOI: 10.3390/nu15051224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review on Individualized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Infants

Abstract: The need for high quality evidence is recognized for optimizing practices of parenteral nutrition (PN). The purpose of the present systematic review is to update the available evidence and investigate the effect of standardized PN (SPN) vs. individualized PN (IPN) on protein intake, immediate morbidities, growth, and long-term outcome in preterm infants. A literature search was performed on articles published in the period from 1/2015 to 11/2022 in PubMed and Cochrane database for trials on parenteral nutritio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 PN is started early after birth to bridge the transition from placental nutrition to enteral feeding. 13 Few studies have discussed the relationship between the duration of PN and the length of stay in preterm infants. This study found that the longer the duration of PN, the longer the hospitalization of preterm infants, with a strongly positive correlation coefficient = 0.627.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 PN is started early after birth to bridge the transition from placental nutrition to enteral feeding. 13 Few studies have discussed the relationship between the duration of PN and the length of stay in preterm infants. This study found that the longer the duration of PN, the longer the hospitalization of preterm infants, with a strongly positive correlation coefficient = 0.627.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the choice of parenteral nutrition type (PN, SPN, or IPN) remains controversial, with the available studies providing very limited evidence [ 22 ]: SPN did not seem to lower rates of death, sepsis, or NEC, and PN duration compared to IPN [ 19 , 22 ]. To assess the true clinical benefit of SPN compared to IPN, sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials—RCTs—are needed, especially in lower gestational age cohorts and when surgery is needed.…”
Section: Standard Versus Individualized Parenteral Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the first standardized PN formulations for neonates, its benefits and risks have been intensively discussed. [5][6][7] Many clinicians approve the "one size fits all"-approach, [8][9][10] even if it appears counterintuitive that it can feed neonates adequately, especially preterms and critically ill newborns. Today, guidelines generally recommend standardized PN solutions over individualized PN (IPN) for most newborns, including very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%