Systematic Review on Enhanced Recovery and Radical Cystectomy

Goonewardene, Sanchia S.; Ventii, Karen; Bahl, Amit; Persad, Raj; Motiwala, Hanif; Albala, David

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57915-9_59

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pre‐, intra‐, and post‐operative components are included in multimodal, interdisciplinary enhanced recovery after surgery pathways to lessen provider variance. ER, after‐surgery utilisation, may lead to a shorter length of stay, fewer problems, lower expenditures, and better wound healing 5‐13 . However, fewer reports compare ER after surgery's effect on wound dehiscence 14‐18 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ER, after‐surgery utilisation, may lead to a shorter length of stay, fewer problems, lower expenditures, and better wound healing. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 However, fewer reports compare ER after surgery's effect on wound dehiscence. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 We sought to comprehensively analyse in this meta‐analysis the outcome of ER after RC on wound dehiscence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Wound dehiscence in enhanced recovery after open radical cystectomy: A meta‐analysis

Xue

Liu

et al. 2023

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A meta‐analysis study to assess the outcome of enhanced recovery (ER) after radical cystectomy (RC) on wound dehiscence was performed. A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1457 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 772 open RC subjects in the picked studies' baseline, 436 of them were enhanced recovery after RC, and 336 were open RC. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of enhanced recovery after RC on wound dehiscence after open RC by the dichotomous styles and a fixed or random model. The ER after RC caused significantly lower wound dehiscence (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30–0.89, P = .02) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 46%) compared with open RC. The ER after RC caused significantly lower wound dehiscence compared with open RC. Thorough precaution should be taken when commerce with the consequences because a limited number of studies were found and selected for this meta‐analysis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%