2022
DOI: 10.56499/jppres21.1182_10.1.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of antazoline in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Abstract: Context: In the emergency department, patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation are typically managed with intravenous antiarrhythmic agents. However, the currently used agents have a low efficacy and safety profile. Antazoline is an antihistaminic agent that has been shown to have a strong antiarrhythmic effect when administered intravenously, facilitating rapid conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Aims: To systematically review the literature on the safety and efficacy of antazoline in the treatment of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was the most successful drug in restoring the sinus rhythm during the observation period. Despite its efficacy and safety, it is noteworthy that the role of antazoline has yet to be incorporated into the guidelines of either the European Resuscitation Council or European Society of Cardiology [ 35 ]. Recently, a Polish study described antazoline as superior to propafenone and amiodarone in sinus rhythm conversion, with the adverse effect rate comparable and in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it was the most successful drug in restoring the sinus rhythm during the observation period. Despite its efficacy and safety, it is noteworthy that the role of antazoline has yet to be incorporated into the guidelines of either the European Resuscitation Council or European Society of Cardiology [ 35 ]. Recently, a Polish study described antazoline as superior to propafenone and amiodarone in sinus rhythm conversion, with the adverse effect rate comparable and in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%