2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of the CUP trials characteristics and perspectives for next-generation studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these trials could then be compared with those published in historical cases of CUP that received similar treatment at a known primary site. Despite the lack of prospective randomization, similar results will generate rapid progress in this field (28). Positron emission tomography/CT is also valuable for primary tumor diagnosis (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results of these trials could then be compared with those published in historical cases of CUP that received similar treatment at a known primary site. Despite the lack of prospective randomization, similar results will generate rapid progress in this field (28). Positron emission tomography/CT is also valuable for primary tumor diagnosis (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The assessment of recently published CUP literature allows to recommend two comprehensive clinical trial designs, a visionary and a pragmatic approach. Both are amenable to implementing the latest diagnostics and therapeutic advances to improve the quality of CUP research and the prognosis of many patients [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for treatment, it is paramount to identify patients who fall into one of the defined “favorable” (20% of CUP) or “unfavorable” subset categories ( 7 ). The percentage of unfavorable patients who do not fit into the previously historically defined favorable subsets is substantially smaller than several years ago, and the favorable subset group is becoming larger ( 8 ). Therefore, the diagnosis is very significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%