2011
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqr068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of rotator cuff tears in workers' compensation patients

Abstract: Our results show that although WC patients experience substantial benefits from various treatments for full-thickness RC tears, disparities exist between them and their non-WC counterparts. The lack of WC-specific literature limited our results. Larger studies, particularly ones comparing WC patients with their non-compensable counterparts, are crucial to allow for future evidence-based recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
38
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence that compensation status has on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgical treatment for musculoskeletal disorders has been investigated by a number of clinical studies [2], [7], [22], [23] and systematic or meta-analytic reviews[24][27]. However, there are methodological flaws in the design of many of these studies which diminishes the confidence one may have in their findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence that compensation status has on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgical treatment for musculoskeletal disorders has been investigated by a number of clinical studies [2], [7], [22], [23] and systematic or meta-analytic reviews[24][27]. However, there are methodological flaws in the design of many of these studies which diminishes the confidence one may have in their findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are methodological flaws in the design of many of these studies which diminishes the confidence one may have in their findings. For example, two of the systematic reviews [24], [27] considered only disease-specific studies and were therefore limited to a very small number of studies. This approach leads to results that lack generalizability across patient populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These injuries have a significant negative effect on work productivity [ 11 , 12 ] and are often associated with poor surgical recovery [ 13 - 15 ]. Unfortunately, research studies focusing on shoulder injuries in adults have commonly been oversimplified in their representation of individuals injured in the workplace often categorizing injured workers based solely on their compensation status [ 16 ] rather than exploring type or severity of injury or reasons for failure to management. The classification of injured workers in this simplistic fashion may have contributed to inaccurate claims and perpetuated stigmas regarding the prognosis, treatment effect and overall outcomes of injured workers with disorders of the shoulder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant disease burden attached to painful tendinopathy not only in terms of healthcare costs, but also in terms of time off work and impact on patients' quality of life [44]. Therefore, the effective treatment of painful tendinopathy has a huge potential to save money and improve quality of life [38]. In general, the etiology of these tendinopathies remains unclear, although the commonly affected tendons all experience high levels of mechanical stress [48] and overuse is a frequently implicated risk factor [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%