2018
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia

Abstract: The current reporting of PRP preparation methodology and final composition is inconsistent and insufficient to enable comparison between studies and determination of efficacy for particular treatment applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the data from this small pilot study does suggest it may be possible to determine the most significant growth factors, and their optimal concentrations for efficacy, with larger trials involving comparative cohorts. Attempts to objectively investigate the effects of PRP, with quantification of hair growth and comparison to defined PRP characteristics, should be a priority …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the data from this small pilot study does suggest it may be possible to determine the most significant growth factors, and their optimal concentrations for efficacy, with larger trials involving comparative cohorts. Attempts to objectively investigate the effects of PRP, with quantification of hair growth and comparison to defined PRP characteristics, should be a priority …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to objectively investigate the effects of PRP, with quantification of hair growth and comparison to defined PRP characteristics, should be a priority. [32,51,52]…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of PRP has been increasing, and different techniques have been described; among them, tubes with ACD-A, tubes with ficoll and kits for cellular separation have been used. [5][6][7][8] Esra et al 9 made a comparison of the aforementioned concluding that the use of tubes with ACD-A is superior to the tubes with ficoll, and no statistically significant difference was found with the cellular separation kits. 9 We used ACD-A tubes with good results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%