2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of organizational motivations for adopting CMM-based SPI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition there is evidence that the majority of small software organisations are not adopting standards such as CMMI [9,10].…”
Section: Study Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition there is evidence that the majority of small software organisations are not adopting standards such as CMMI [9,10].…”
Section: Study Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the quality assessment, data is extracted from only those papers that are considered to be of sufficient quality. Following the approach in [9], we extracted the data immediately after performing the quality assessment. It was felt that for both the quality assessment and the data extraction steps, a paper must be read in relatively close detail.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is also clear that the Irish software industry is largely ignoring the most highly-publicized SPI models. In the case of CMMI (and its predecessor CMM), Staples and Niazi [9] discovered, after systematically reviewing 600 papers, that there has been little published evidence about those organizations who have decided not to adopt CMMI.…”
Section: Problems With Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%