2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0797-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection

Abstract: Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and enucleation of insulinoma appear to be safe procedures with reduced hospital stay, though morbidity remains significant. The evidence for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is in its infancy, but the authors feel it is unlikely that many centers will achieve sufficient case load to make the introduction of minimally invasive resection feasible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
79
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also found no difference between open and laparoscopic approach with regard to the operative times, frequency of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and treatment costs. Further comparative studies and systematic reviews proved the laparoscopic approach to be superior also in terms of shorter operative times and decreased blood loss [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also found no difference between open and laparoscopic approach with regard to the operative times, frequency of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and treatment costs. Further comparative studies and systematic reviews proved the laparoscopic approach to be superior also in terms of shorter operative times and decreased blood loss [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spleen preserving LDP has been described to be safe and feasible (10,22) and has been reported in 18.2% (16) to 60.4% (31) of LDPs.…”
Section: Distal Pancreatectomy (Dp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery was first documented in numerous case series largely conducted at single institutions [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. As familiarity developed, significant experiences were reported.…”
Section: Meta-analyses Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As familiarity developed, significant experiences were reported. Naturally, higher-volume centers have offered direct comparisons of laparoscopic and open outcomes [6,7,11,14,16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Over the past year, five reports have advanced this literature by pooling such studies using meta-analytical techniques [28, 29 • , 30, 31, 32 • ].…”
Section: Meta-analyses Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation