Systematic review of measurement properties of self‐reported instruments for evaluating self‐care in adults

Lommi, Marzia; Marinis, Maria Grazia De

doi:10.1111/jan.13204

Cited by 35 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The aim of this study was to validate the SASE‐I in a sample of adults aged 65 and older. The SASE was selected among other self‐care instruments as it showed good psychometric properties in previous studies . Our findings showed the SASE‐I has good validity and reliability, but partially differs from the SASE‐S.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…Although several instruments are available to assess self‐care in the general population, only three self‐report instruments have been developed specifically for the healthy elderly population : Lorensen's Self‐Care Capability Scale , the Self‐care of Home‐dwelling Elderly instrument and the Self‐care Ability Scale for the Elderly (SASE) . Researchers developed these instruments in Scandinavian countries, showing the interest these countries have regarding self‐care in the ageing process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Researchers developed these instruments in Scandinavian countries, showing the interest these countries have regarding self‐care in the ageing process. The SASE is the most studied instrument of the three with better psychometric properties than the other two . It assesses the perceived self‐care ability of older adults and is based on Pörn's theory of health and adaptedness .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In these studies, the SASE showed strong evidence for content validity, moderate evidence for construct validity and hypothesis testing and conflicting evidence for internal consistency .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cross‐validation of the Self‐care Ability Scale for Elderly (SASE) in a sample of Italian older adults

Raffaele

Biagioli

Cirillo

et al. 2018

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assessment of self-care among older adults is important as it permits the tailoring of educational interventions directed to prevent health deterioration and contrast the effects of ageing. The Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly (SASE) was developed to assess the perceived self-care ability in older adults. Its psychometric properties were tested only in Scandinavian countries and China. This research was a cross-validation of the SASE on 402 Italian adults aged 65 and older recruited in hospitals, clinics and homes, from September 2016 to February 2017. We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on two subsamples and identified three factors, self-care ability to perform ADLs, self-care ability to achieve well-being and self-care ability to set personal goals, with a good model fit (CFI > 0.93; RMSEA = 0.07; SRMR = 0.06). We eliminated four items, however, to improve the structural validity. Internal consistency for the three factors of the Italian version of the SASE (SASE-I) ranged from 0.72 to 0.92. The test-retest reliability indicated good stability of the scale (ICC coefficient = 0.92). We assessed convergent validity by comparing the SASE-I with the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, showing moderate-to-strong correlations. In addition, the SASE-I discriminated the self-care ability in groups with different ages, levels of education and settings. Our study produced a 13-item version of the SASE with good psychometric properties that could be recommended for use in clinical practice and research after further validation on different populations and settings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In these studies, the SASE showed strong evidence for content validity, moderate evidence for construct validity and hypothesis testing and conflicting evidence for internal consistency .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross‐validation of the Self‐care Ability Scale for Elderly (SASE) in a sample of Italian older adults

Raffaele

Biagioli

Cirillo

et al. 2018

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, there is no single criterion in the selection of the instruments. Nurses and researchers should decide which instrument is best for assessing on the basis of the purpose of the study, research approach (Streiner & Kottner, 2014;Urpí-Fernández et al, 2017) and evidence shown by specific measurement properties to be important for a particular condition or population (Matarese, Lommi, & De Marinis, 2017). such as measurement error and responsiveness, was found.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of measurement properties of instruments assessing nurses’ attitudes towards the importance of involving families in their clinical practice

Alfaro‐Díaz

Esandi

Gutiérrez-Alemán

et al. 2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To identify, appraise and describe the characteristics and measurement properties of instruments assessing nurses’ attitudes towards the importance of involving families in their clinical practice. Design Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their time of inception to June 2018. Review Methods Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of studies, extracted data, and appraised the methodological quality of the studies using the COSMIN checklist. Results A total of 19 studies representing 5 instruments were included. Two instruments—a revised version of the Families’ Importance in Nursing Care: Nurses’ Attitudes scale (FINC‐NA‐R) and the Family Nurse Practice Scale (FNPS)—obtained higher scores for most of their properties. The instruments used in the remaining eight studies require further assessment of their psychometric properties. Conclusion This psychometric review offers a synthesis of the quality of the available instruments and gives a better understanding of nursing theory‐based tools. The FNPS and FINC‐NA‐R instruments seem to be the most suitable measures of nurses’ attitudes towards the importance of involving families in their clinical practice. Impact The growing emphasis on improving nurse–family relationships and the quality of care provided makes it necessary to have valid and reliable instruments for assessing nurses’ attitudes towards the importance of involving families in their clinical practice. This paper provides evidence that will help clinicians and researchers make decisions about the most suitable instrument based on a critical appraisal and comparison of the measurement properties according to a rigorous methodology.

show abstract

Requirements and Key Features of a Mobile Application for Adolescent Self-Care From a Stakeholders Perspective: A Qualitative Study

Rezaee,

Ghaffari,

Rabiei

et al. 2024

J of Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic review of measurement properties of self‐reported instruments for evaluating self‐care in adults

Abstract: Despite the development of several instruments to assess self-care in the adult population, no instrument can be fully recommended to clinical nurses and researchers. Further studies of high methodological quality are needed to confirm the measurement properties of these instruments.

Cited by 35 publications

References 41 publications

Cross‐validation of the Self‐care Ability Scale for Elderly (SASE) in a sample of Italian older adults

Cross‐validation of the Self‐care Ability Scale for Elderly (SASE) in a sample of Italian older adults

Systematic review of measurement properties of instruments assessing nurses’ attitudes towards the importance of involving families in their clinical practice

Requirements and Key Features of a Mobile Application for Adolescent Self-Care From a Stakeholders Perspective: A Qualitative Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About