Systematic review of excess mortality in India during the Covid-19 pandemic with differentiation between model-based and data-based mortality estimates

Natarajan, Subramanian; Subramanian, Poonam

doi:10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_11_22

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Conventional and frugal methods of estimating COVID-19-related excess deaths and undercount factors

Dedhe,

Chowkase,

Gogate

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Across the world, the officially reported number of COVID-19 deaths is likely an undercount. Establishing true mortality is key to improving data transparency and strengthening public health systems to tackle future disease outbreaks. In this study, we estimated excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Pune region of India. Excess deaths are defined as the number of additional deaths relative to those expected from pre-COVID-19-pandemic trends. We integrated data from: (a) epidemiological modeling using pre-pandemic all-cause mortality data, (b) discrepancies between media-reported death compensation claims and official reported mortality, and (c) the “wisdom of crowds” public surveying. Our results point to an estimated 14,770 excess deaths [95% CI 9820–22,790] in Pune from March 2020 to December 2021, of which 9093 were officially counted as COVID-19 deaths. We further calculated the undercount factor—the ratio of excess deaths to officially reported COVID-19 deaths. Our results point to an estimated undercount factor of 1.6 [95% CI 1.1–2.5]. Besides providing similar conclusions about excess deaths estimates across different methods, our study demonstrates the utility of frugal methods such as the analysis of death compensation claims and the wisdom of crowds in estimating excess mortality.

show abstract