2011
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy

Abstract: Accuracy rates are improving. Current levels of reported accuracy suggest that routinely collected data are sufficiently robust to support their use for research and managerial decision-making.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
494
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(506 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(19 reference statements)
11
494
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our study population was unrestricted and thus was representative of patients with type 2 diabetes of varying age, disease stage, and severity. Third, the CPRD and HES databases used in this study have been validated extensively to ensure data accuracy (11,29). Moreover, the CPRD collects information on potentially important confounders, such as HbA 1c and BMI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our study population was unrestricted and thus was representative of patients with type 2 diabetes of varying age, disease stage, and severity. Third, the CPRD and HES databases used in this study have been validated extensively to ensure data accuracy (11,29). Moreover, the CPRD collects information on potentially important confounders, such as HbA 1c and BMI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescriptions and diagnoses collected in the CPRD are regularly audited and have been shown to be valid and of high quality (7)(8)(9)(10). The HES database records hospital admission dates, primary and secondary diagnoses (coded using the ICD-10 classification), and related procedures and has been shown to have good accuracy (11).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37][38][39] Nonetheless, a recent systematic review of discharge coding accuracy in routine UK data found that primary diagnosis accuracy has improved from 73.8% to 96.0% in the 10 years since the introduction of Payment by Results. 40 Not all delivery records contain supplementary information, although the percentage of records with a complete maternity tail has improved over time. 41 HES data have more general limitations in the recording other potential confounders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, some England non-HF admissions might actually have been for HF and so should have been included in our cohort. However, this is not likely to have a big effect, as the primary diagnosis in English data is well recorded [22]. This difference could also happen if those who survive their first HF admission in Lombardy are sicker than those who survive it in England.…”
Section: Lombardy Patients Had More Hf Admissions Each On Average Thamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some quality of care measures and some predictors of readmission are associated only with HF readmissions but not with other readmissions [26]. Administrative databases typically have some underrecording of comorbidities, though this has been found not to bias estimated relations between comorbidity and mortality [27] and the primary diagnosis is well recorded [22]. We were unable to capture symptom severity or other physiological parameters for either country, as these are not included in the databases.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%