2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of data analyses and reporting in group-based social skills intervention RCTs for youth with ASD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Change scores were used in this investigation instead of alternative methods of pre- and post-test analyses, which may have influenced results. A clustered design was not utilized in this design and this may have impacted our statistical power and effect size of intervention effects ( 57 ). Additionally, a small sample size reduces our ability to generalize our findings to larger groups of adolescents with ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change scores were used in this investigation instead of alternative methods of pre- and post-test analyses, which may have influenced results. A clustered design was not utilized in this design and this may have impacted our statistical power and effect size of intervention effects ( 57 ). Additionally, a small sample size reduces our ability to generalize our findings to larger groups of adolescents with ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite progress to improve social skills for individuals with ASD, (DeRosier et al, 2011; Ichikawa et al, 2013; D. Kamps et al, 2015; Solomon et al, 2004; Soorya et al, 2015), relatively few well-conducted randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown generalized or maintained effect, especially on skills not directly taught (DiSalvo & Oswald, 2002; Hirvikoski et al, 2015; Laugeson et al, 2012; Lopata et al, 2019; Rao et al, 2008; White et al, 2013). One reason may be the focus on specific social skills rather than on targeting underlying mechanisms and the omission of treatment components that may help maintain and generalize skills to other people and contexts (Lerner et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%