2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of co-occurring OCD and TD: Evidence for a tic-related OCD subtype?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This register-based study confirmed the clinical observations of many previous specialist clinic-based studies [20] in a population-based cohort. Indeed, compared with individuals with OCD and no history of tics, individuals with ticrelated OCD had earlier age at first OCD diagnosis [20,21], were more likely males [5,[22][23][24], had a higher number of comorbidities [27], and, in particular, higher rates of ADHD and ASD [25], but also epilepsy and intellectual disability. Conversely, compared with individuals with tic-related OCD, individuals with non-tic-related OCD had higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and bipolar disorder, also in line with previous work [25,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This register-based study confirmed the clinical observations of many previous specialist clinic-based studies [20] in a population-based cohort. Indeed, compared with individuals with OCD and no history of tics, individuals with ticrelated OCD had earlier age at first OCD diagnosis [20,21], were more likely males [5,[22][23][24], had a higher number of comorbidities [27], and, in particular, higher rates of ADHD and ASD [25], but also epilepsy and intellectual disability. Conversely, compared with individuals with tic-related OCD, individuals with non-tic-related OCD had higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and bipolar disorder, also in line with previous work [25,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These patients present with typical clinical characteristics: earlier age of OCD onset [9,20,21], greater proportion of males [5,9,[22][23][24], higher rates of symmetry and sexual/ aggressive obsessions [9,24,25], and sensory phenomena preceding the compulsions [22,26]. Albeit less consistently, studies have also reported a greater number of psychiatric comorbidities [27] and higher rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) [25] in this patient group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One potential approach to alternative treatments includes looking at psychological disorders by taking into account the shared pathophysiology and comorbidity with OCD, such as in the case with tic disorders [ 8 ]. Studies about the comorbidity of OCD and tic disorders have revealed lifetime prevalence rates ranging from 14 to 61.5% of all patients, while studies focused on the prevalence of comorbidity in pediatric patients have shown rates ranging from 37.6 to 42.5% of patients [ 9 ]. Moreover, preliminary evidence shows that co-occurring OCD and tic disorders show stronger alterations with respect to dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems than do patients with mutually exclusive OCD or tic disorders when compared with healthy individuals [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There might be cognitive differences between clinical subgroups of OCD (i.e; obsessing/checking (O/C) v. symmetry/ordering (S/O); autogenous v. reactive) (Abramovitch & Cooperman, 2015; Bragdon, Gibb, & Coles, 2018; Fan et al, 2016; Lee, Yost, & Telch, 2009) and none of the studies included in this review explored the effect of symptoms dimensions in the probands of the OCDrel. Neurobiological subtypes including ‘neurodevelopmental’ and ‘Tic-related OCD’ subtypes might potentially be associated with distinctive cognitive deficits (Blanes & McGuire, 1997; Castle & Phillips, 2006; Kloft, Steinel, & Kathmann, 2018; Leckman, Bloch, & King, 2009; Saxena, Brody, Schwartz, & Baxter, 1998). Unfortunately, the studies included in this meta-analysis did not include relevant data to investigate the relationship between cognitive functioning and neurobiological subtypes of OCD in the patient sample or in probands of OCDrel sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%