2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of bankruptcy prediction models: Towards a framework for tool selection

Abstract: The Leeds Beckett repository holds a wide range of publications, each of which has been checked for copyright and the relevant embargo period has been applied by the Research Services team. We operate on a standard take-down policy. If you are the author or publisher of an output and you would like it removed from the repository, please contact us and we will investigate on a case-by-case basis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
147
0
18

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
2
147
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Aruldoss et al (2015), Cultrera and Bredart (2016), Salehi and Pour (2016), the information rendered by bankruptcy forecasting models is bounded to separate industries. Alaka et al (2018), Schonfeld et al (2018), Svabova and Kliestik (2018), and Slefendorfas (2016) believe that the traditional bankruptcy prediction models are not suited to analyzing modern enterprises because the dynamic macroeconomic environment and business are interdependent. As a result, different economic environments possess diverse characteristics that restrict a repeated application of models and sets of related factors under different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Aruldoss et al (2015), Cultrera and Bredart (2016), Salehi and Pour (2016), the information rendered by bankruptcy forecasting models is bounded to separate industries. Alaka et al (2018), Schonfeld et al (2018), Svabova and Kliestik (2018), and Slefendorfas (2016) believe that the traditional bankruptcy prediction models are not suited to analyzing modern enterprises because the dynamic macroeconomic environment and business are interdependent. As a result, different economic environments possess diverse characteristics that restrict a repeated application of models and sets of related factors under different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic review of bankruptcy prediction models is processed in the studies of Alaka et al [25] or Peres and Antao [26]. The reviews show that there are two groups of popular and promising tools within the bankruptcy prediction models research area, i.e., statistical tools (multiple discriminant analysis and logistic regression) and artificial intelligence tools (decision trees, neural networks, etc.).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPMs (see a comprehensive review of FPM studies in [42]). This led to the tuning of nnet (ANN) parameters, towards achieving the first objective of this study.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%