2008
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for Treating Essential Hypertension

Abstract: Background:The relative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for lowering blood pressure is unknown.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
215
1
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
7
215
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The report did note that BP outcomes in trials of longer duration, eg, up to 5 years, were confounded by the coadministration of other antihypertensive drugs in some patients. 35 Since the publication of these reports on the comparative BP-lowering effects of specific ARBs, a new ARB, azilsartan medoxomil (AZL), has been approved by the FDA based on the prespecified primary efficacy criterion of lowering mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP rather than the more traditional analysis of seated office trough diastolic BP reduction. 36 There are relatively few studies that have directly compared specific ARBs in the same patient population.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Arbs In Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report did note that BP outcomes in trials of longer duration, eg, up to 5 years, were confounded by the coadministration of other antihypertensive drugs in some patients. 35 Since the publication of these reports on the comparative BP-lowering effects of specific ARBs, a new ARB, azilsartan medoxomil (AZL), has been approved by the FDA based on the prespecified primary efficacy criterion of lowering mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP rather than the more traditional analysis of seated office trough diastolic BP reduction. 36 There are relatively few studies that have directly compared specific ARBs in the same patient population.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Arbs In Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) can provide all the same clinical benefits if not more than those provided by ARBs. 3,4 However, ARBs are generally better tolerated as they are associated with a significantly lower risk of cough and angioedema than ACE inhibitors. [4][5][6][7] Renin inhibitors represent a more recently developed class of molecules also designed to inhibit activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and lower blood pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be the reason why the editorialist commenting on ONTARGET stated, "ARBs have more side effects than ACE inhibitors," 11 despite the common knowledge that they do not. 12 …”
Section: The Misleading Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%