2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic-review and meta-analysis on effect of decontamination interventions on prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter spp. during primary processing of broiler chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was minimal publication bias observed from the symmetrical distribution of studies within the funnel, radial and QQ plots and further confirmed by Egger's regression and Begg's rank tests as recommended (Veroniki et al ., 2016). Despite the low‐level risk of bias observed, inadequate generation of allocation sequence, lack of concealment and blinding, poor description of sampling procedures and use of artificially Salmonella inoculated chicken carcasses would potentially increase heterogeneity within the studies as previously reported (Gichure et al ., 2022). The lack of standard guidelines on reporting the effect of Salmonella decontamination on chicken carcasses have been reported as a critical setback when pooling results from several studies in food safety assessment (EFSA, 2010; Kahan et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was minimal publication bias observed from the symmetrical distribution of studies within the funnel, radial and QQ plots and further confirmed by Egger's regression and Begg's rank tests as recommended (Veroniki et al ., 2016). Despite the low‐level risk of bias observed, inadequate generation of allocation sequence, lack of concealment and blinding, poor description of sampling procedures and use of artificially Salmonella inoculated chicken carcasses would potentially increase heterogeneity within the studies as previously reported (Gichure et al ., 2022). The lack of standard guidelines on reporting the effect of Salmonella decontamination on chicken carcasses have been reported as a critical setback when pooling results from several studies in food safety assessment (EFSA, 2010; Kahan et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in Campylobacter spp. have been attributed to the use of commercially available antimicrobial technologies throughout the processing of broiler chickens ( McKenna et al, 2020 ; Gichure et al, 2022 ). Kemp et al (2001) reduced microbial levels on contaminated chicken carcasses utilizing an online acidified sodium chlorite spray system and an inside-outside broiler chickens carcass washer.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Campylobacter In Broiler ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For beef, removal of Salmonella and STEC is a high priority. For poultry carcasses, many different treatments are available for dealing with the risk of campylobacteriosis (Gichure et al 2022). A number of different decontamination methods are used in slaughterhouses worldwide and these can be divided into physical methods (e.g.…”
Section: Decontamination Of Carcassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the only substance allowed for decontamination of carcasses in the EU is lactic acid for washing beef carcasses, cuts and trimmings (EC 2013). However, physical methods can achieve greater Campylobacter reductions than chemical treatments (Gichure et al 2022). At poultry slaughter, several physical decontamination treatments are allowed and sometimes used in the EU, including rinsing with potable water (e.g.…”
Section: Decontamination Of Carcassesmentioning
confidence: 99%