2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0841-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes

Abstract: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an update on the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We searched MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE and the drug manufacturer's website for randomised controlled trials of vildagliptin in patients with T2DM. Sixty-nine studies (28,006 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo vildagliptin reduced HbA1c (weighted mean difference WMD -0.69 %; 95 % CI -0.83 to -0.56 %; I (2) = 82 %), and it was as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are in line with the results from a meta‐analysis of randomized studies for vildagliptin, a meta‐analysis for DPP‐4 inhibitors based on observational data only or of both, observational and RCTs and various noninterventional studies which reported no increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to DPP‐4 inhibitor nonusers. In contrast, a recent noninterventional study and a meta‐analysis of three large randomized DPP‐4 inhibitor outcome trials (none of which included vildagliptin) reported an increased risk of pancreatitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our data are in line with the results from a meta‐analysis of randomized studies for vildagliptin, a meta‐analysis for DPP‐4 inhibitors based on observational data only or of both, observational and RCTs and various noninterventional studies which reported no increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to DPP‐4 inhibitor nonusers. In contrast, a recent noninterventional study and a meta‐analysis of three large randomized DPP‐4 inhibitor outcome trials (none of which included vildagliptin) reported an increased risk of pancreatitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…15 Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 69 RCTs revealed no association of vildagliptin with elevated hepatic enzymes (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.28-1.36). 18 Similarly, no indication of an increased risk of serious infections was observed with vildagliptin. Safety data from a meta-analysis reported that the incidence of infections was comparable between vildagliptin and comparator groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is in line with a pooled analysis of 38 RCTs which also showed no evidence of an increased risk for ALT/AST ≥ 3 × ULN accompanied by bilirubin for vildagliptin 50 mg bid relative to comparators (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.29‐4.90; P = 0.999) . Furthermore, a recent meta‐analysis of 69 RCTs revealed no association of vildagliptin with elevated hepatic enzymes (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.28‐1.36) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, improvement of abdominal pain and abdominal imaging despite continuation of medications except vildagliptin supports that vildagliptin is the only possible culprit in the development of AP. DPP-4 inhibitors are important drugs for the treatment of DM2, and they are generally considered safe and well tolerated (7). An AP risk has been previously noted with this class of medications, especially with sitagliptin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DPP-4 inhibitors are generally considered safe, there were reports of severe pancreatitis in patients receiving sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, which prompted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue an alert on this adverse reaction (6). A meta-analysis did not reveal an increased incidence of pancreatitis with the newer DPP-4 inhibitor, vildagliptin (7). However, there are recent reports of AP due to vildagliptin (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%