“…and ), such as walking speed (obtained by assessing the distance in meters covered per minute); cadence (computed by measuring the number of steps per unit of time, e.g., per minute); step width (i.e., the distance from the midpoint to midpoint of both heels) and length (i.e., the distance from the point of foot contact to the point of contralateral foot contact); swing (i.e., the time period during gait initiation when the one foot is not in contact with the ground) and stance time (i.e., the time period when both feet are on the ground); double support phase (%); stride length (i.e., distance covered during one gait cycle measured in cm); and standard deviation of stride length (i.e., the distance covered during one gait cycle; i.e., in cm) and swing time (i.e., the time period when one foot is not in contact with the ground) . The gait patterns of older adults have been characterized by decreases in gait speed, minimum toe clearance, ground reaction force values, and ankle dorsiflexion, but also by increases in body sway, step width, stride duration, double support duration, minimum foot clearance variability, as well as in stride and step length, which consequently decreases the proportion of time spent in the single‐support swing phase of the gait cycle that normally helps to maintain medio‐lateral stability and improve balance, whereas cadence seems to remain largely unaffected (Table ) . Additionally, gait variability in older adults has been implicated as a predictor of increased risk of falling; yet, from a biomechanical point of view, this variability also reflects the ability to adapt limb movement during the walking act so as to increase stability.…”