2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08816-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI features for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our research also supported the evidence that peripancreatic fat infiltration and necrosis, two semantic features of imaging, were indicators for poor prognosis, in accordance with previous studies (15,38). Peripancreatic fat infiltration might reflect the extent of tumor invasion, not simple a desmoplastic reaction or edema (13,15,39). The presence of peripancreatic fat infiltration reduces the chance of R0 resection and leads to poor survival outcomes (13,40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, our research also supported the evidence that peripancreatic fat infiltration and necrosis, two semantic features of imaging, were indicators for poor prognosis, in accordance with previous studies (15,38). Peripancreatic fat infiltration might reflect the extent of tumor invasion, not simple a desmoplastic reaction or edema (13,15,39). The presence of peripancreatic fat infiltration reduces the chance of R0 resection and leads to poor survival outcomes (13,40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…10,17,18 Diagnostic clues obtained from imaging features are important, to minimize unnecessary surgical procedures and health-care costs. In addition to TB, local autoimmune pancreatitis 19 and initial polyarteritis nodosa 20 are rare but can mimic pancreatic cancer, highlighting the need to pay more attention to the differential diagnosis of masses within or around the head of pancreas when CT or MRI images show atypical manifestations. The sensitivity of multidetector CT for pancreatic carcinoma was reported to be >85% to 90%, 21,22 but its specificity was unsatisfactory at only 58%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To differentiate AIP from pancreatic cancer, the MRI features favoring AIP are diffuse enlargement (diagnostic OR, 75), a capsule-like rim (52), multiple strictures of the main pancreatic duct (47), and homogeneous delayed enhancement (46). 47 In contrast, the MRI features favoring pancreatic cancer are target-type enhancement (diagnostic OR, 41) and a discrete pancreatic mass (35).…”
Section: 47mentioning
confidence: 99%