Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Methodological Quality in In Vivo Animal Studies of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Abstract

As a result of increased awareness of wide-spread methodological bias and obvious translational roadblocks in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) research, various checklists and guidelines were developed over the past decades. This systematic review assesses the overall methodological quality of preclinical SAH research. An electronic search for preclinical studies on SAH revealed 3415 potential articles. Of these, 765 original research papers conducted in vivo in mice, rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, pigs, goats, and non-human primates with a focus on brain damage related to delayed cerebral vasospasm and early brain injury met the inclusion criteria. We found methodological shortcomings still to prevail in preclinical SAH research. In addition, basic animal characteristics were typically well described but important technical parameters of SAH induction were often underreported. None of the species, models, or techniques used in preclinical SAH research was methodologically superior to the others. Methodological quality of preclinical SAH research was independent of the number of citations or impact factor of a publication. Consequently, we suggest the SAH research community should consider strategies to improve preclinical research quality in their field, such as public platforms to (pre)register preclinical experiments, consequent support of open science policies, stricter editorial (and reviewer) control of (pre)existing guidelines, and increased efforts in education and training of good laboratory practice for the next generation of researchers.

A Narrative Review on Translational Research in Acute Brain Injury

“…The authors suggest the registration of preclinical experiments, strict editorial and reviewer policy, and increased efforts in the education and training of researchers in laboratory practice. 61 Several agents like magnesium, endothelin antagonists, statins, and tirilazad have failed to improve outcomes in human clinical trials. The failure of therapeutics that targeted vasospasm in particular, leads to the concept of EBI too being an important determinant of secondary brain injury and outcome.…”

“…The authors suggest the registration of preclinical experiments, strict editorial and reviewer policy, and increased efforts in the education and training of researchers in laboratory practice. 61…”

Lumen-oriented versus wall-oriented treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysms – A systematic review of suggested therapeutic concepts

“…71 One potential reason behind the failure of translation may have been related to the inadequacy of animal models. 72 Endovascular device research performed in animal models is riddled with bias that allow treatments to advance uncontrolled into human trials. For example, a novel treatment can achieve excellent occlusion rates in a swine model because of the animal's intrinsic capability of excellent and robust wound healing.…”

A Multi-Model Pipeline for Translational Intracerebral Haemorrhage Research

“…The most widely used animals for experimental ICH research are rodents. Although rabbit models also exist, they are predominantly used for subarachnoid haemorrhage research, and as such, will not be discussed here [35][36][37][38]. A PubMed assessment of the literature using the search terms 'intracerebral haemorrhage in rats' and 'intracerebral haemorrhage in mice' identified 497 studies published since 2015.…”