2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of spontanous coronary artery dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 20–22 An older study of 32 869 patients from 3 centres in western Denmark identified a SCAD prevalence of 0.2% during 8 years whereas a Japanese study of 20 195 MI patients collected in 20 centres during 13 years identified a SCAD prevalence of 0.31%. 20–22 Our results are in concordance with the recently published meta-analysis by Franke et al 23 including more than 2000 patients. In addition, we did not exclude patients with angiographic signs of atherosclerosis in other than SCAD vessels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“… 20–22 An older study of 32 869 patients from 3 centres in western Denmark identified a SCAD prevalence of 0.2% during 8 years whereas a Japanese study of 20 195 MI patients collected in 20 centres during 13 years identified a SCAD prevalence of 0.31%. 20–22 Our results are in concordance with the recently published meta-analysis by Franke et al 23 including more than 2000 patients. In addition, we did not exclude patients with angiographic signs of atherosclerosis in other than SCAD vessels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the inhospital outcomes reported by Garcia-Guimaraes et al 5 are confirmatory, if not better than those reported by others,3 the MAEs and MACCEs reported did not include the considerable psychosocial burden associated with SCAD, including insomnia, anxiety, depression and even post-traumatic stress disorder,6 stemming from the lack of precise knowledge of disease pathophysiology and the considerable concerns experience by many SCAD sufferers of the possibility of recurrences. Of interest in this regard, Garcia-Guimaraes and colleagues5 reported a SCAD recurrence rate of only 2% over a median follow-up of over 2 years, which is markedly lower than the 17% over a median follow-up of 3.9 years and 29.4% over 10 years reported by the Mayo Clinic Group,7 and 22% reported by Nakashima et al 8 over a median follow-up of 2.8 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an infrequent but increasingly recognised cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that predominantly affects relatively young women aged 45–52 years and may even occur in association with pregnancy, where it is the most common cause of a myocardial infarction 1 2. In contrast to ACS due to atherosclerotic disease, SCAD sufferers have few traditional risk factors apart from hypertension,3 and the pathophysiology involves impaired coronary flow, not due to plaque rupture, plaque erosion or thrombus formation associated with a calcific nodule, as is the case for atherosclerotic disease,4 but to the spontaneous formation of an intramural haematoma (IMH) that causes dissection of the vessel wall medial layer. The IHM is likely due to vasa vasorum rupture with or without an intimal tear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, females who accounted for the remaining 43% were significantly younger with an average age of 42.5 years, compared to 47.5 years for male patients (223). It is unclear to what extent referral bias contributed to this divergence in patient populations, however, this follows the same trend of age-based gender risk observed in aortic dissection and SCAD (109,161). A history of a cerebral aneurysm has been reported in almost 1 in 5 CeAD patients (18.2%), suggesting a common genetic risk (224).…”
Section: Cervical Artery Dissection Associated Conditions and Risk Fa...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sexual dimorphism is less apparent in PA dissections, with a slight tendency to occur more frequently in males than females (ratio 1.1:1). However, as with the aforementioned arterial dissection types, cases diverge with both age and gender (109,161,223) where males represented 76% of cases in the age group 21-30, while females represented 70% of cases in the age group 41-50 (Figure 5).…”
Section: Pulmonary Artery Dissectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%