2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review: Anastomotic microvascular device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…14 It has gained widespread acceptance and been routinely applied on FTTs. 5,15 In 1995, DeLacure et al 16 applied a microvascular anastomotic coupler for free flap head and neck reconstruction for the first time; since then, much research on the microvascular anastomotic coupler in free flap head and neck construction has been reported. 1,2 In this study, 69 microvascular couplers were used for venous end-to-end anatomoses in 69 flap reconstructions, and the overall flap survival rate was 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 It has gained widespread acceptance and been routinely applied on FTTs. 5,15 In 1995, DeLacure et al 16 applied a microvascular anastomotic coupler for free flap head and neck reconstruction for the first time; since then, much research on the microvascular anastomotic coupler in free flap head and neck construction has been reported. 1,2 In this study, 69 microvascular couplers were used for venous end-to-end anatomoses in 69 flap reconstructions, and the overall flap survival rate was 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ardehali et al (2014) have reported, in their review, that more than 2900 venous anastomosis have been carried out with a patency of 98.5% (Ardehali et al, 2014). However, they conclude that the use is mostly limited to venous anastomosis (Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For a traditional handsewn anastomosis, the intimal-penetrating technique presents a risk for intravascular thrombosis, which can lead to eventual flap loss in some patients. 3,7 Over the past 20 years, the successful use of microvascular anastomotic coupling devices for venous anastomoses has been well documented in breast and head-neck reconstruction, but data focusing on mandibular reconstruction are lacking. 8 This study represents the largest series to date examining the use of microvascular anastomotic couplers in the microsurgical reconstruction of mandibular defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%