2018
DOI: 10.1111/jce.13740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic re‐evaluation of SCN5A variants associated with Brugada syndrome

Abstract: Based on contemporary ACMG-AMP guidelines, only a minority of SCN5A variants implicated in BrS fulfill the criteria for pathogenicity or likely pathogenicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used WES to identify potential candidate gene in incident SUDEP cases and we found a new, rare, harmful variant in SCN5A , absent in epilepsy and non-epilepsy controls. Other variants in SCN5A were previously reported in SUDEP cases,7 12 and potentially predisposing to malignant cardiac arrhythmia 15–17. We also identified two rare qualified variants in KIF6 and TBX16 (previously associated with heart diseases), also absent in epilepsy and non-epilepsy controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We used WES to identify potential candidate gene in incident SUDEP cases and we found a new, rare, harmful variant in SCN5A , absent in epilepsy and non-epilepsy controls. Other variants in SCN5A were previously reported in SUDEP cases,7 12 and potentially predisposing to malignant cardiac arrhythmia 15–17. We also identified two rare qualified variants in KIF6 and TBX16 (previously associated with heart diseases), also absent in epilepsy and non-epilepsy controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Concerning IAS, Smith et al reported a reclassification after one year of 3% of rare variants [25]. In 2018, a reclassification of rare variants previously considered deleterious in Brugada Syndrome was performed; only 37% were classified as P or LP following current ACMG recommendations [8]. A recent study identified a modification in 52% of rare variants classified as VUS seven years ago [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that 25–30% of BrS cases have P variants in SCN5A. However, two recently published re‐evaluations of all SCN5A variants reported in BrS concluded that only 37–47% should remain classified as P/LP for BrS (Denham et al, ; Kroncke et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ID represents the identifier number of a gene. | 761 remain classified as P/LP for BrS (Denham et al, 2018;Kroncke et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation