2008
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2008.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Prenatal Screening for Psychosocial Risks

Abstract: The Prenatal Risk Overview (PRO) was designed to screen for 13 psychosocial risk factors associated with poor birth outcomes. This study describes the development and implementation of the PRO in 4 community health centers. The study also examines the prevalence, co-occurrence, and inter-correlations of psychosocial risks in their prenatal populations. The study sample included 1,386 prenatal patients screened between November 2005 and April 2007; 95% were women of color; 77% were not married. The PRO classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The PHQ-9 has been demonstrated to be a reliable tool for assessing depressive symptomology among obstetrics-gynecology patients. 29,30 We used items from the Spanish version of the PHQ-9 used by Wulsin et al 31 To evaluate depressive symptoms over the pregnancy period, we created the response options of (1) never; (2) several weeks, over the pregnancy; (3) more than half the pregnancy; or (4) nearly the whole pregnancy. These response options differ from DSM-IV criteria in terms of duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The PHQ-9 has been demonstrated to be a reliable tool for assessing depressive symptomology among obstetrics-gynecology patients. 29,30 We used items from the Spanish version of the PHQ-9 used by Wulsin et al 31 To evaluate depressive symptoms over the pregnancy period, we created the response options of (1) never; (2) several weeks, over the pregnancy; (3) more than half the pregnancy; or (4) nearly the whole pregnancy. These response options differ from DSM-IV criteria in terms of duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current substance abuse surveillance efforts depend on either: (1) medical record review for those who elect to enroll in studies, which does not provide generalizable or gender-specific data (Harrison and Sidebottom 2008; Fabris et al 1998; Shankaran et al 1994; Funkhouser et al 1993;); (2) biologic specimen testing (Behnke 2013), which is neither systematically administered during pregnancy nor universally at the time of delivery and depends on the timing of drug usage; or (3) national surveys, which only capture self-reported medical/SUD conditions (Bada et al 2002). Epidemiologic analyses often separate the mother-child dyad into unrelated individuals, thus limiting investigation of the impact of maternal SUD and SUD treatment on subsequent birth outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, systematic multidimensional prenatal risk screening is needed as a practice for identifying the highest risk pregnancies and as a source of program evaluation baseline data. 4,15 Healthy Start evaluations will need to minimize the bias induced by differences between participants and nonparticipants on a variety of risk factors that have not been considered before. In general, randomized controlled trials were not available to evaluate programs like HS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%