2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2004.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Model-Based Testing of Embedded Automotive Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that this alignment mechanism, together with transformation, was observed most frequently, we can assert that establishing traceability is, in general, a main concern of the studied alignment methods. As shown in the analysis, the between-phase links with a connection type mechanism dominate, mapping for example technical requirements to test scenarios (Case I [Damian et al 2005]), requirements classification trees to logical test scenarios (Case G [Conrad et al 2005]), or test reports to requirements models (Case H [Abbors et al 2009]). This observation concurs with Gotel and Finkelsteins' [1994] definition of requirements traceability referring to "the ability to describe and follow the life of a requirement, in both forwards and backwards direction".…”
Section: Summary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that this alignment mechanism, together with transformation, was observed most frequently, we can assert that establishing traceability is, in general, a main concern of the studied alignment methods. As shown in the analysis, the between-phase links with a connection type mechanism dominate, mapping for example technical requirements to test scenarios (Case I [Damian et al 2005]), requirements classification trees to logical test scenarios (Case G [Conrad et al 2005]), or test reports to requirements models (Case H [Abbors et al 2009]). This observation concurs with Gotel and Finkelsteins' [1994] definition of requirements traceability referring to "the ability to describe and follow the life of a requirement, in both forwards and backwards direction".…”
Section: Summary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification Tree method, which is used effectively in traditional software development, was proposed by Conrad to systematically test embedded model-based software [10]. This method requires dividing each input variable range into a set of scenarios (equivalent classes) and carefully selecting one of the test scenarios of inputs to frame a test case for testing a particular requirement.…”
Section: Astmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automation has changed the way software is being developed leading to merging of design and coding phases into one phase termed "modeling". Correspondingly, the phases in the model-based software development include specifications, modeling, and testing phases [10]. In modeling, design gradually develops into an executable artifact with different layers of graphical abstractions called models from which highly optimized code is generated automatically using code generators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies focus on the concept of test scenarios as a means of managing the requirements of the increasingly complex automotive embedded software, they take a formalized approach to the generation and use of test scenarios like in [5], [112] and [113].…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%