2010
DOI: 10.2495/risk100111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic method of risk assessment in industrial processes

Abstract: Mankind has passed over a significant historical frontier, namely the expansion of technological processes where hazardous substances are potential threats for employees, the public, the environment and property and, therefore, it is there is an inevitable need to pay increased attention to the occurrence of industrial accidents and, mainly, their prevention. The area of safety of technical and technological systems is very closely connected, not only with the reliability of the processes but it has also wider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, assigning values to each indicator will be done using an expert evaluation based on data and results obtained from methods used for data acquisition. The methodology was elaborated on the basis of large literature research (Brickson 2007;Buganova et al 2014;Eames and Moffett 1999;Fraser and Henry 2007;Hesarzadeh and Bazrafshan 2018;Holla et al 2010;Karjalainen et al 2020;Kubas et al 2017;Kurc and Oktay 2018;Lewis et al 2015;Lovecek and Ristvej 2010;Lovecek et al 2017;Ristvej et al 2013;Rehak et al 2018;Siser et al 2017;Siponen et al 2014;Vance et al 2012;Wirtz et al 2016). Besides that, methodology contains a precise definition of questions set up by the interviews and the questionnaire survey, which should be focused on when assigning values to individual indicators.…”
Section: Evaluating the Security And Safety Culture Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, assigning values to each indicator will be done using an expert evaluation based on data and results obtained from methods used for data acquisition. The methodology was elaborated on the basis of large literature research (Brickson 2007;Buganova et al 2014;Eames and Moffett 1999;Fraser and Henry 2007;Hesarzadeh and Bazrafshan 2018;Holla et al 2010;Karjalainen et al 2020;Kubas et al 2017;Kurc and Oktay 2018;Lewis et al 2015;Lovecek and Ristvej 2010;Lovecek et al 2017;Ristvej et al 2013;Rehak et al 2018;Siser et al 2017;Siponen et al 2014;Vance et al 2012;Wirtz et al 2016). Besides that, methodology contains a precise definition of questions set up by the interviews and the questionnaire survey, which should be focused on when assigning values to individual indicators.…”
Section: Evaluating the Security And Safety Culture Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks related to critical infrastructure elements or processes can arise from many different causes or scenarios [63]. In order to properly analyse, assess and consider individual system risks, they must be allocated to the relevant system components.…”
Section: System Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological processes and equipment are closely linked to industrial risks. This is a process of assessing the projected decline to a satisfactory level and continuously monitoring the risks for organizations [27]. It is possible to help manufacturing and non-manufacturing organizations or specialists with the support of virtual and augmented reality applications.…”
Section: What Industrial Sectors Use Virtual Training?mentioning
confidence: 99%