2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00544.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic melittology: where to from here?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of this isolated new species is provided in the context that such works have inherent value, constitute the foundations for biological patterns and hypotheses of species diversity (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007;Gonzalez et al, 2013), contribute to future species-level revisions (Engel, 2011), and assist with efforts to conserve and understand global biodiversity. The format for the descriptions generally follows that used elsewhere for Melectini (e.g., Rightmyer & Engel, 2003;Straka & Engel, 2012;Engel & Michener, 2012;Alqarni et al, 2014), while morphological terminology follows that of Engel (2001) and Michener (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of this isolated new species is provided in the context that such works have inherent value, constitute the foundations for biological patterns and hypotheses of species diversity (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007;Gonzalez et al, 2013), contribute to future species-level revisions (Engel, 2011), and assist with efforts to conserve and understand global biodiversity. The format for the descriptions generally follows that used elsewhere for Melectini (e.g., Rightmyer & Engel, 2003;Straka & Engel, 2012;Engel & Michener, 2012;Alqarni et al, 2014), while morphological terminology follows that of Engel (2001) and Michener (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species are not difficult to locate, such as C. (C.) gemella (Cockerell), and so it is hoped that regional efforts will be made to locate nests of other species and gradually build a comparative framework for understanding nesting and biological diversity within the group, along with a characterization of the immature stages. Such efforts may discover biological traits that corroborate or refute hypotheses established otherwise only from features of the external morphology (Engel, 2011). The opportunity is taken also to remove two species from an already polymorphic and putatively paraphyletic Caenaugochlora s.str.…”
Section: Journal Of Melittologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that it would be more meaningful to recognize each of the subgenera as individual genera, and even to further divide Caenaugochlora s.str., a step that is initiated below. Ultimately, a more permanent solution awaits a comprehensive treatment of the species, as there remain several undescribed and many incompletely known (e.g., from a single sex), and an eventual phylogeny encompassing as much of the diversity as is permissible, combining morphology, DNA sequences, and other forms of data (e.g., Engel, 2011). Descriptions matter, and in the above context it is from the documentation of these new species and their unique amalgamation of traits that we derive our understanding of relationship and other phenomena (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007).…”
Section: Journal Of Melittologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we believe no such great strides will be made without a systematic treatment to act as the gateway to further research. Although largely descriptive in nature, descriptions such as those presented here test basic hypotheses of species circumscription and document abiding patterns of variation (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007;Engel, 2011;Gonzalez et al, 2013), and hopefully shall provide a more rigorous framework for advancing our knowledge of the subgenus.…”
Section: Journal Of Melittologymentioning
confidence: 99%