2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Mapping of RNA-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo

Abstract: SummaryRNA molecules can attach to chromatin. It remains difficult to know what RNAs are associated with chromatin and where are the genomic target loci of these RNAs. Here, we present MARGI (Mapping RNA-genome interactions), a technology to massively reveal native RNA-chromatin interactions from unperturbed cells. The gist of this technology is to ligate chromatin associated RNAs (caRNAs) with their target genomic sequences by proximity ligation, forming RNA-DNA chimeric sequences, which are converted to sequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of RADICL-seq with existing technologies. RADICL-seq introduces substantial improvements over similar RNA-chromatin proximity ligation approaches [7][8][9] . Compared with MARGI, RADICL-seq minimizes the frequency of spurious interactions in the dataset by performing the in situ ligation in intact nuclei.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of RADICL-seq with existing technologies. RADICL-seq introduces substantial improvements over similar RNA-chromatin proximity ligation approaches [7][8][9] . Compared with MARGI, RADICL-seq minimizes the frequency of spurious interactions in the dataset by performing the in situ ligation in intact nuclei.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few technologies have emerged to assess genome-wide RNA-chromatin interactions [7][8][9] , but each has limitations. Mapping RNA-genome interactions (MARGI) is a proximity ligationbased technology that requires a high number of input cells (i.e., hundreds of millions) and the disruption of the nuclear structure 7 , which can result in detection of a large number of spurious interactions 10 ; because of this, it has limited applicability to investigations of RNA-chromatin interactions in multiple cell types. Chromatin-associated RNA-sequencing (CHAR-seq) and global RNA interaction with DNA by deep-sequencing (GRID-seq) utilize in situ approaches to detect genome-wide RNA-chromatin contacts 8,9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relative sizes suggest that genomic regions in proximity to nuclear speckles may be significantly larger than the typical sizes of ChIP-seq or ATAC-seq peaks. Nevertheless, the enrichment of Xist RNA on X chromosome revealed by imaging ( Jonkers et al., 2008 ) was successfully corroborated by genomics technologies including RAP-seq ( Engreitz et al., 2014 ) and MARGI ( Sridhar et al., 2017 ), offering an example of convergent findings from imaging and genomics approaches. In this work, we tested our “nsaRNA proximity” hypothesis by combining microscopic information and genomics data and aimed for establishing an RNA-based approach for identifying the relative positions of the folded genome and subnuclear structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The recent technology on global mapping of RNA- g enome interactions (MARGI) enabled the identification of interacting genomic sequences of chromatin-interacting RNAs ( Sridhar et al., 2017 ). After cross-linking and genome fragmentation, MARGI ligates RNA, a linker sequence, and proximal DNA to form an RNA-linker-DNA chimeric sequence, which is subsequently converted to double-stranded DNA and subjected to paired-end sequencing (see Figure 1 of Sridhar et al. (2017) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indeed has happened. The diverse regulatory and other functions of heterochromatin can now be examined in terms of the large variety of small and long noncoding RNAs generated by and associated with this enigmatic component of eukaryotic genomes (Bierhoff et al, 2014;Chuong et al, 2017;Felden and Paillard, 2017;Lakhotia, 2017aLakhotia, , 2017bSawyer and Dundr, 2017).The presence of chromosomal RNAs, reported in 1960s but quickly debunked in 1970s (see above), may find parallels in the roles of RNAs like the Xist and roX transcripts and in the many other small and long noncoding RNAs that associate with chromatin and affect its structural and functional organization (Bell et al, 2017;Johnson et al, 2017;Lakhotia, 2016Lakhotia, , 2017aLakhotia, , 2017bSridhar et al, 2017;Velazquez Camacho et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resurgence Of Noncoding Rnas In the 'Genomics Era'mentioning
confidence: 99%