2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.7.011021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Magnus-Based Approach for Suppressing Leakage and Nonadiabatic Errors in Quantum Dynamics

Abstract: We present a systematic, perturbative method for correcting quantum gates to suppress errors that take the target system out of a chosen subspace. It addresses the generic problem of nonadiabatic errors in adiabatic evolution and state preparation, as well as general leakage errors due to spurious couplings to undesirable states. The method is based on the Magnus expansion: by correcting control pulses, we modify the Magnus expansion of an initially-given, imperfect unitary in such a way that the desired evolu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All control parameters of Hamiltonian H ′ 0 are added the label "′" to distinguish the Hamiltonian H 0 , and we set τ ′ 1 = T − τ 1 for brevity hereafter. Here, the remarkable difference with other periodic works [43][44][45] is that we cannot employ the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion to calculate the effective Hamiltonian H e f f , since the driving frequency ω = 2π T is demanded for the same magnitude to the energy gap in this periodic system. The method we adopt is to directly calculate the evolution operator within a period T , then achieve the effective Hamiltonian H e f f by definition U(T ) ≡ e −iH e f f T [46].…”
Section: Two-step Modulation In General Three-level Systemmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All control parameters of Hamiltonian H ′ 0 are added the label "′" to distinguish the Hamiltonian H 0 , and we set τ ′ 1 = T − τ 1 for brevity hereafter. Here, the remarkable difference with other periodic works [43][44][45] is that we cannot employ the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion to calculate the effective Hamiltonian H e f f , since the driving frequency ω = 2π T is demanded for the same magnitude to the energy gap in this periodic system. The method we adopt is to directly calculate the evolution operator within a period T , then achieve the effective Hamiltonian H e f f by definition U(T ) ≡ e −iH e f f T [46].…”
Section: Two-step Modulation In General Three-level Systemmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We may use the projectors for the ILS and CLS from Eqs. (28) and (30) to decompose E into four channel components:…”
Section: B Coherent Leakage Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ω is the optical Rabi frequency, ∆ is the relevant dipole detuning, and Γex is the excited-state population decay rate. To suppress opticallyinduced decoherence, we can exploit a combination of techniques, such as dark states, shortcuts to adiabatic passage, and systematically-corrected control pulses [47][48][49], in addition to the use of a relatively large dipole detuning. Excited-state mediated spin-mechanical coupling via a dark state has already been demonstrated in an earlier experimental study [40].…”
Section: A Spin-mechanical Resonatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%