2016
DOI: 10.5121/ijait.2016.6401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review on Resource Allocation and Resource Scheduling in Cloud Computing

Abstract: 1.INTRODUCTIONCloud computing is a technique which provides a delivery of computing resources over the Internet. Cloud computing is one of the latest buzzwords in the world of Information Technology, which means key to the definition of cloud computing is the "cloud" itself, but, the exactly meaning of the cloud is that clouded cover computing is a set of web based computing resources that deliver on demand information services to users from any location in the world. The purpose of using cloud is that cloud i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have presented issues faced by cloud service provide and cloud service consumer in comprehensive manner, but the evolution and trends in scheduling techniques remain unaddressed. Also, Lavanya and Shoba [7] presented a review on resource allocation and resource scheduling in cloud computing in systematic literature manner. Authors have discussed the evolution of resource scheduling techniques but evaluation of presented techniques was not discussed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have presented issues faced by cloud service provide and cloud service consumer in comprehensive manner, but the evolution and trends in scheduling techniques remain unaddressed. Also, Lavanya and Shoba [7] presented a review on resource allocation and resource scheduling in cloud computing in systematic literature manner. Authors have discussed the evolution of resource scheduling techniques but evaluation of presented techniques was not discussed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%